this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
134 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3447 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) says he will hold up a $1 trillion “minibus” spending package that needs to pass by the end of the day Friday to avoid triggering a partial government shutdown.

“I will hold it up primarily because we’re bankrupt and it’s a terrible idea to keep spending money at this rate,” Paul told The Hill on Wednesday.

“The spending bills before us will lead to a $1.5 trillion deficit for the year. We’re borrowing about $1 trillion every three months. It’s an alarming pace of accumulation of debt,” he said.

“My opposition to this will be based on how much” the package would add to the U.S. debt, which now stands at $34.5 trillion, he added.

Asked if he would delay final Senate passage of the bill past the weekend, which would trigger a partial government shutdown, Paul shrugged and lifted his palms to the air, signaling he hadn’t decided yet how long to delay it.

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 93 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

He couldn't run fast enough to give the billionaire class 1.5 trillion of our tax dollars in 2017 under the Trump administration. That alone exploded our debt even more than Reagan did. That's quite the accomplishment.

Oh, and our taxes go up this year and keep increasing. The billionaire classes' never will.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 8 months ago (2 children)

“My opposition to this will be based on how much” the package would add to the U.S. debt, which now stands at $34.5 trillion, he added.

Hmm, why could be a cause of this?

"On December 22, 2017, President Donald Trump signed into law the so-called Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), a $1.9 trillion tax bill favoring corporations and wealthy Americans." source

And who approved this legislation?

source

Senator Paul, you have much to be blamed for in causing this.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

Anyone have that first graph in a dollar amount? Seems odd to display that as a percentage.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Wow that first graph really tells a story. That's a great post. Thanks for taking the time.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 8 months ago

Ok then. Slash the military budget and give half that money to the IRS with directives to go after the rich tax dodgers. Oh no, that isn't what you meant Rand?

[–] [email protected] 44 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Alright someone text his neighbor, he knows how to deal with Rand Paul.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I feel like there's a good story here that I'm unaware of. If you would be so kind as to fill me in I'd be much obliged.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/prosecutors-reveal-why-rand-paul-was-attacked-neighbor-n839366

Paul suffered five rib fractures, including three displaced fractures, and later required medical attention for pneumonia.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Why is it always Rand Paul? The poor man does not understand how spending and taxation work.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He does understand, but he is a malicious jerk who wants all the tax money to benefit the wealthy so he lies about things to get his way.

For example, cutting taxes on the wealthy and then using the lack of funding to deny benefits to the less fortunate.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

republican standard operating procedure 'starve the beast'

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

He's just doing Putin/Trump's bidding as usual.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Because he's expendable.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago

“And I’ll do it exclusively for Putin”

—Rand Paul

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

“I will hold it up primarily because we’re bankrupt and it’s a terrible idea to keep spending money at this rate,” Paul told The Hill on Wednesday.

Just in case anyone wondered whether the guy named after a fraud beloved by total morons (Ayn Rand) BY a fraud beloved by total morons (Ron Paul) is still being a fraud appealing to total morons by pretending that he doesn't know the difference between a national budget and a household budget after 13 years as a senator.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

the guy named after a fraud beloved by total morons (Ayn Rand)

"Rand" is a short form of "Randal", his full name. His father didn't name him after Ayn Rand.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago

Nah, I read somewhere that his dad loved ayn rand and male prostitutes.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago

Russia Rand earning his rubles

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You can’t spend the money and then decide you don’t want to pay the bill. Not how it works.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Their primary candidate is currently attempting to prove you wrong on a "few" different fronts with a "handful" of court cases.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

Yea, for all the people who think the senate is necessary, here you go. 2 senators per state is why we have to deal with this bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

don't blame me, I've never voted for this carpetbagging asshole who is using our seat to grandstand for an office he is never going to win.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Dumb duh dumb dumb duh!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

TERADOLLAR!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) says he will hold up a $1 trillion “minibus” spending package that needs to pass by the end of the day Friday to avoid triggering a partial government shutdown.

“I will hold it up primarily because we’re bankrupt and it’s a terrible idea to keep spending money at this rate,” Paul told The Hill on Wednesday.

Funding for the departments of Defense, Labor, Health and Human Services, State and other federal agencies will expire at 11:59 p.m. on Friday.

The Kentucky lawmaker said he would seek to amend the package, which was crafted by a small group of congressional leaders and senior appropriators after negotiations with the White House.

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), another prominent conservative, is urging colleagues to vote against the bill and its numerous expected earmarks, which are technically banned under the Senate GOP conference rules.

Ignoring this truth has contributed to our $34 trillion national debt,” Lee posted on X, the social media site formerly known as Twitter.


The original article contains 311 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 47%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!