this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
93 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15681 readers
225 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this.

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Zizek calls himself a leftist and of course then says a bunch of horrific liberal bullshit. What a joke of a man.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 58 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Radical recuperator.

This neoliberal prankster is thus the epitome of a radical recuperator. He cultivates and markets the appearance of radicality in order to recuperate potentially radical elements in society, particularly young people and students, within the pro-imperialist anti-communist fold. This is precisely why he is the most famous ‘Marxist’ in the capitalist world, festooned by the likes of a journal linked to the engine of U.S. imperialism. His mantra is nothing but an opportunistic perversion of the closing lines of The Communist Manifesto: “Cultural consumers of the pro-Western world unite—and buy my next book, or movie, or crossover product, or whatever, and so on, and so on!”

[–] [email protected] 41 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Filing Noam Chomsky under this umbrella

[–] [email protected] 44 points 7 months ago

Noam "Epstein associate" Chomsky

[–] [email protected] 39 points 7 months ago

The thing that is most telling about Chomsky is that while his criticisms of US foreign policy in particular are spot on, he never actually advocates for any alternative except some vague notion of "anarchism", which I don't think he has ever explained how it would come to fruition. All the while being fervently anti-communist.

Parenti was right about that clown parenti

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

imo Noam Chomsky doesn't really fit into it anymore bcs ever since he said that Ukraine is a proxy war and that it would be better to actually have a peaceful resolution to the conflict the libs have completely despised him

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

He founded JVP and dunked on Sapir Whorf tho.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 7 months ago

Dudes just casually advocating for the end of all life on earth.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Now I understand why that witch would turn a raccoon into a man

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

I'd like the witch to turn him back

[–] [email protected] 43 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So if Plan A was to throw as much of Ukraine into the meat grinder as possible while eventually delivering defeat by economic and/or industrial exhaustion to Russia so that the ruins of both countries could be sold off for parts, what's Plan B now that it's not working? Is The West ^TM^ stuck grinding this out until Ukraine is forced to sue for peace, and Halliburton et al. will have to console themselves with all the defense contracts awarded along the way, or are we going to hear increasingly escalating rhetoric until a really big bomb gets dropped somewhere where it does a whole lot of damage and things go extra pear-shaped?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago

It looks like they’re trying to turn Ukraine into a weapons hub after the war is over in whatever territory is left after the Russian offensive is done. The next big fight will be for Odessa since it is Ukraines last shot at a port. It’s every sign that Russias going to take it. That being said now that the US is pulling funding out of Ukraine it really looks like Europe is going forward outside of the leadership of the US. This is why I’m kinda concerned that Macron and the Germans are not joking about boots on the ground. If that happens it may or may not be with natos help. Defense contractors as always are still winning.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 7 months ago (1 children)

it's kind of impressive he managed to mangle the causes of two separate conflicts in one shot like that.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 7 months ago

You have to study for a very long time to become such a talented jagoff

[–] [email protected] 42 points 7 months ago

So glad the attitude has turned against Zizek here. Man was always a hack

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago

select all images with mark hammill

[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago

No big surprise from someone who's been denounced as a non-marxist way back when he was still in university

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Damn. They're going to try to give Ukraine nuclear weapons, aren't they?

[–] [email protected] 42 points 7 months ago (3 children)

they won't even give Ukraine modern fighter planes because of the risk of blowback, I think there's no risk that they'll actually hand nukes over to their pet nazis

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago

Won't give them long range missiles either for the same reasons

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

Yeah, you're right. That's good.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

because of the risk of blowback

When has that ever stopped the imperialists before?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well right now it's stopping them from providing longer range missiles/ballistics, EW aircraft, stealth fighters, non-export Abrams tanks, naval vessels, de-mining vehicles, etc

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Lmao the US empire is getting cold feet these days if a little blowback is putting them off. Is this what their excuse of "escalation" is really covering for? I feel like there's more to it that just blowback, because arming and supporting fascists is something they love doing.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If they spend all their wunderwaffen at the Ukraine store, Ukraine will still lose and then they won't get to spend their wunderwaffen in the Yemen store, or the Palestine store, or the China store, and I think the top levels of the military and intelligence apparatus aren't so far gone that they believe Russia's nuclear missiles don't work

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

That's probably it michael-laugh

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

It's not because of the risk of blowback but it's inevitability. The west knows Ukraine will have to capitulate eventually to Russia. At the very least give over the Donbas region. Maybe more. They aren't in a winning position and everyone knows it except libs on the internet. If they were hopeful it would have been done.

What we'll do is arm other NATO nations more heavily.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nah Zizek is just a fascist.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago

Unfortunately true. I used to really like him, sad to see his true face these days.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

hitler-detector This shit on the left be going wild on Zizek

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

Piers Morgan has clearly been practising his Tucker Carlson/Johnny Harris Serious Face(tm)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

I found a YouTube link in your post. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: