444
Protestation (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 102 points 6 months ago

I'm all for the general gist, but "no criminals?" Bullshit.

They had slavery. Don't imagine it was a utopia just because colonizers hadn't made it worse yet.

[-] [email protected] 49 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They, like most other people in the world, had slavery, genocide, theft, the death penalty, and all sorts of other bad things. None of this excuses colonialism, at all. But to pretend that native peoples were some kind of wonderful noble savages is very very racist in and of itself. Even this comment is fairly racist because I just implied some kind of homogenous culture in North American indigenous peoples, which was obviously not the case.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

Yeah but they didnt have a single instance of movie piracy.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

YoU wOUldNt dOwNLoAd a HorSe

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

The self flagellation is a bit much, but I get it.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

I mean, the quote is from a first nations person. The only one “pretending that native peoples were some kind of wonderful noble savage” is the person the quote is attributed to. A holy man of the Lakota tribe. Calling him discussing his tribe racist is…weird.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Comparison of "we" versus "our white brothers" is a racial one and not a tribal one.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Who exactly are you talking about when you say "they"? Indigenous peoples weren't all the same culture and didn't have all the same cultural practices.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

WTF

I was all set to type up a little semi agreeing comment about how it was a continent-spanning complex mixture of very different tribes with different cultures and practices, only some of whom practice slavery

But I don't really know what I'm talking about so I read a little and I got distracted by this

Several tribes held captives as hostages for payment.[2][3] Various tribes also practiced debt slavery or imposed slavery on tribal members who had committed crimes; full tribal status would be restored as the enslaved worked off their obligations to the tribal society.[2][3]

Slaves would sometimes be killed in potlatches, to signify the owners' contempt for property.[citation needed]

And this

Captive-taking was most often used to replace a dead loved one within the family with a new person. The captive would then take on this deceased person’s sexual or labour-related capacities.

What the fuck was going on with the Native Americans

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

You seem like an expert on the topic, do you know if they had chattel slavery?

[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

You seem like an expert on the topic, do those goalposts come with wheels?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Not until white people, no.

Source: am Cherokee and we didn't have chattel slavery until we were deemed "the south" and tried to fit in. Then some (that were rich enough) got slaves, and treated them horribly. Before that, "slaves" were more like indentured servants in that they could conceivably get freedom and were considered part of the tribe.

There was a huge exhibit in Tahleqah in the Cherokee courthouse museum last summer all about it. Even named names.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah, that makes sense to me. I would've been very surprised if they had chattel slavery on any level similar to the US.

It's interesting some people were offended I even brought it up. It's like they prefer to pretend all slavery was the same. I'm curious if they ever wonder who/what benefits from that mentality/narrative

Thanks for the info on that exhibit. It sounds super interesting!

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Indentured servitude is slavery. Full stop.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Indentured servitude is NOT chattel slavery. That's also not what pre-colonial Cherokee practiced, but it's a closer concept. It's a much longer oral explanation that I doubt you'd accept anyway.

I suggest you look up the definitions of both before equating the two. I'm partially Cherokee, and another part was a white man who was shipped to the American colonies as an indentured servant, under penalty of death. After 14 years he was free, purchased land, chose a wife, and had a family. That family wasn't born into slavery, the children weren't sold and shipped off as soon as they could be weaned from their mother's breast, and he was given all the rights that a white landowner could have in the 1700s. Someone sold into, or born into, chattel slavery could not do this. They were born, lived, and died at the mercy of their master.

There is a reason historians make a distinction. No, neither is acceptable. But chattel slavery was not practiced by native tribes prior to colonization.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

You're Cherokee? Nice to meet you my very, very distant cousin. My white ancestors came in two waves, in the first most died during witch trials. The second wave (the relevant one) was a few Indentured servants, all but one died of bring overworked. That's a distressing common patttern of indentured servitude, there was an end date but you were unlikely to survive your master trying to get the best out of his investment. To call I Indentured Servitude less than slavery is degrading to every one of those people. For a more modern analogy, if Indentured Servitude isn't a form of slave labor, then prison labor, which is even listed in the Constitution as a form of slave labor is not in fact slavery.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 53 points 6 months ago

Every group had their own culture. There is no universal First Nations/ Native American culture. Beware of anyone expressing pan-indigenous viewpoints.

[-] [email protected] 39 points 6 months ago

So are we just propping up noble savage ideology now?

[-] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

OP is about to reinvent anarcoprimitivism

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

No we are pushing that exile, torture, and capital punishment are better than rehabilitation

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 37 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This quote appears to be from Lame Deer, Seeker of Visions about John Lame Deer’s tribe, the Lakota people, and his experiences.

I didn’t read the book I just wanted to find out where the quote was from. It is from one man’s lived experiences in his tribe.

Communities with less took care of those who were the worst off, why can’t we?

[-] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago

Communities with less took care of those who were the worst off, why can’t we?

We can. We choose not to. There's a difference.

Take that as an indication of everyone you interact with during your day on where their priorities lie.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah, attribution for quotes is kinda important - especially when there's so many people faking native American quotes out there. Any time you see something about "native wisdom" or a a quote, you should immediately look for attribution. At the very least, you should get the nation/tribe and time period of the quote. Otherwise, it's pablum

[-] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago

it's insane to me that so called "human sacrifices" in Central America happened at a lower rate than public executions were happening in Europe.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

In those times there were only a handful of gods to appease, but thousands of capitalists.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

Keep the indigenous posting coming. It really gets the settlers riled up

[-] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

Really cool quotes but they also didn't have much in the way of academics and professional specializations. Simple solutions to complex problems are doomed to fail and cause harm.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

lost redditor

[-] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

You need to read some theory.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

You need to read some history and technical books.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They also fought each other over access to land. We are so much more peaceful than any pre-industrial civilisation

[-] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago

We're still doing that and I would argue that we are no more peaceful, we just now have a NIMBY approach to conflict

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

They also fought each other over access to land. We are so much more peaceful than any pre-industrial civilisation

Said without irony as the IDF slaughters thousands in order to control access to Gaza. Not to mention Russia and Ukraine and the dozens of other conflicts that the media doesn't cover because their not in places where the West can profit. Industrialization only increased our killing capacity.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

Wow, the sniveling redditor from the other thread caping for neoliberalism is a chauvinist?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Lmao, imagine simping for a 70 year old Winnie the Pooh Dictator who looks like he lost to a crack addiction.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

Attribution would be good to include

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Wetiko is the great evil of modern civ.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
444 points (89.8% liked)

Communism

1633 readers
257 users here now

Welcome to the communist Lemmy community! This is a community for all Marxist.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS