410
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 79 points 1 year ago

i am feeling so impatient. just throw this asshat in federal prison already.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Indeed. The only place he should go after MarALago and the court rooms.

[-] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago

that just means we're done with the GOP

[-] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago

Sadly the GOP isn’t done with us.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

"in Soviet america, you don't vote for GOP, GOP votes for you!"

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

that's what THEY think, son

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

They've already tried their shit in a small town. Got hit by a chair, and someone swam in from two counties over to beat their asses. Didn't need guns or weapons, just a wholesome ass beating.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

"If conservatives become convinced that they cannot win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism, they will abandon democracy." - David Frum

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

Been that way for a while now

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

while I get and in many ways agree with the sentiment, it is truthful to assert that there was a time when if the Republican Party lost elections, they would actually change their platform and try to win back voters. As American popular culture has shifted more and more to the left, however, now that it's pretty much unthinkable for the electoral map of 1984 to happen again, and they see it as an existential threat.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

You make a good point. I just wasn't alive to see that level of self reflection from the Rebublican party.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. Anyone under 30-40 pretty much only knows the GOP as the party of "Obama is a MMUSL1M!1!!!", but like, it was the Nixon Administration that created the EPA. It's also difficult because much of the economic issues we've experienced from 2008 onwards are because of the Clinton Administration, so the "both parties are the same" argument can be pretty compelling. You could definitely make the argument that in the 90s, they were, but Beau of the Fifth Column on YouTube put it well:

You walk into a bar to find an ATM while on a road trip with your very visibly-queer friend. The bar is full of MAGA hats. Do you feel comfortable leaving your friend out front while you look for the ATM, and maybe take a leak? Now imagine the bar is full of "Vote Blue no Matter Who" shirts.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Judge Cannon watches Fox News? That's quite the surprise

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Thought they were just starting their war on it?

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
410 points (97.9% liked)

politics

18853 readers
4368 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS