205
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 89 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Remember to encourage any military people you know to do this. It's a hard decision with the possibility of real consequences, the more support they have the easier it will be. And if you can push them farther left military trained personnel will be invaluable to any revolution.

[-] [email protected] 79 points 6 months ago

This is exactly the correct take. It's easy to say "fuck the troops" it is harder but no less necessary to also try to reach them when opportunity arises.

[-] [email protected] 59 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Troops willing to recognize that they're participating in evil and willing to do something about it is a carve out of "fuck the troops".

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 69 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Values of the us armed forces lmao

[-] [email protected] 44 points 6 months ago

we don't want to bomb them that hard! have some damn decency!

[-] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

A lot of people who do the violent work of capital aren't actually dead-eyed psychos. Plenty believe there's some worthwhile purpose behind what they're doing. That's half the reason we have such a wall-to-wall propaganda machine; to let the folks pointing the guns rationalize.

There's a big difference between that and doing anything (even as modest as this) that might jeopardize your livelihood for your beliefs, but there's at least an entry point there.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

Yeah but the letter said values of the US Armed Forces not “values of certain individuals within the US Armed Forces.” So as a commentary on the values of the institution itself, the letter is hilariously wrong as the USAF is one of the most evil institutions in the history of mankind

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 65 points 6 months ago

“Support for the conduct of the IDF is unacceptable and inconsistent with our values in the US Armed Forces.”

Uh, no it's not.🤷‍♂️

[-] [email protected] 51 points 6 months ago

Well yeah obviously, and this is certainly not what Bushnell would have written, but the impact is clear as day. Something is stirring.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

Oh, yeah, and that's great, but...unless the left latches onto this and does some serious education, I wouldn't get my hopes up. Imperialism: Now with Nuance!™

[-] [email protected] 60 points 6 months ago

Pounding the table Cool zone

[-] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago

COOL ZONE COOL ZONE

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 53 points 6 months ago

On this day hexbear exonerated uh... was it 7deadlyfetishes or based_ball? For their crucifixion and death on the hill of "muh not all troops" very-intelligent

[-] [email protected] 59 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They were right but for the wrong reason

for the record it was 7deadlyfetishes and they were explicitly doing clean wehrmacht apologia.

[-] [email protected] 64 points 6 months ago

posted too close to the black sun

[-] [email protected] 45 points 6 months ago

Mean thing to call the U.S Army but go off king /jk

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago

bugs-no

7deadlyfetishes came right out and said -- unironically -- that we should feel bad for Nazi concentration camp guards because they were just in it for free college. (Categorically untrue, since those guys were all party loyalists and were only selected for those posts if they were ideologically committed.)

[-] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago

Eh close enough, there's guantanamo prison guards that probably do it for the free college lol

[-] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago

Abu Ghraib "interrogators"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago

Not to defend anything Isreal is doing but where was this energy from these troops at any point during the last 30 years when it was us doing this to random Muslims across the globe and not Isreal?

[-] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

After the movements in Vietnam of people refusing the draft, refusing to carry a rifle, slinging their rifle on their back and surrendering to the first NV soldier they met, sabotaging military equipment, doing mass troop anti-war protests, and last but certainly not least fragging officers, the military propaganda complex went into overdrive pushing out anyone with a nuanced opinion on war and turning dumb teenagers into deus vult crusaders for the American Empire.

Nowadays I think a lot of those tricks have been over used and are thus losing their effectiveness. Back around 9/11 the troops were properly bloodthirsty, but now half the military now are just alienated nerds who hate their job (this does not exonerate them, it merely attempts to explain why we see what we see).

[-] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

I mean to be fair, 30 years ago most of the kids signing this weren't even born yet

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 50 points 6 months ago

sure would be ironic and funny if a combo of decreasing rates of enlistment combiend with deteriorating material conditions causes even like 10% of the u.s. military to radicalize to the left

doubt we'll get a carnation revolution out of it but there could definitely be some funny consequences

[-] [email protected] 45 points 6 months ago

Every days we are getting closer and closer to what historians call the cool zone

[-] [email protected] 44 points 6 months ago

I'm waiting till they declare the Norfolk Soviet

[-] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago

Literally ~~braver than~~ the troops

[-] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago

Definitely interesting, but 100 troops out of 1.3 million active duty members is not really something to get excited about

I feel like tens of thousands is required for cool zone activity

[-] [email protected] 46 points 6 months ago

I don't know how you get to ten thousand on your way up from zero without crossing a hundred, comrade

[-] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

Quantitative changes -> qualitative changes

[-] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Wtf... this seems too good to be true

I think this honestly is fake, considering how the chuddish the U.S army tends to be... but yk, benefit of the doubt, I suppose...

[-] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago

The military is probably more chuddish than the U.S. as a whole, but there are tons of earnest libs who join, too. Think a literal Boy Scout who has vague aspirations of going into politics.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago

If an officer is left alive to give the order, the soldier that didn't frag them is complicit in the genocide. Both will deserve the Hague.

[-] [email protected] 50 points 6 months ago

Okay cool, yeah we all agree about the troops, but the question is "what do we do with this information?" and "how do we leverage this to radicalize potential comrades"

As someone that actually organizes IRL we can't simply write off an important component of any potential successful revolution.

Writing them off and pushing them away out of a sense of moral purity is only going to leave them twisting in the wind and vulnerable to fascists.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago

I like the idea of dissenting soldiers and see the value of getting a Certified 1905 Moment™. An anonymous letter which heavily decries politics and the idea of political soldiers is just performative on its own. It's Step 1. Bushnell showed one form of Step 3. For this to have any real significance to me, I need to see that they're committed to some kind of Step 2. That Step 2, which the whole Certified 1905 Moment™ depends on, would require contradicting the first three paragraphs of this and admitting that war is political and a coherent response against imperialism/colonialism/genocide is political. Maybe it will come but I've been watching the military subreddit responses to Bushnell's self-immolation and it's 100% psychopathic.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago

It is literally a federal crime for soldiers to make "political" statements. Just signing this letter even as soft as it is is grounds for court marshal

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

We must be extremely careful that support for dissenting soldiers does not undermine opposition to participation in the armed forces.

This is clearer if we talk about cops. If I start talking about how some of the cops are actually good and trying to change things what reaction does that conjure up in you? For me it immediately feels like it threatens to undermine all anti-cop work we do. It threatens to convince people that it's ok to be a cop if you're one of the good ones.

This same principle applies to the military. For me, the decision to promote radicalising military members really only becomes a viable prospect when we're actually approaching a sincere possibility of revolution. Outside of that specific situation it feels like it would undermine the work that has been so successful in harming their recruitment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago

And yet nothing will change.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago

Signed by "concerned us military service members"? Who?

[-] [email protected] 41 points 6 months ago

I'm sure the US Military Service would also like to know, so they can be dishonorably discharged

[-] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Or because it's probably just 1 person who published this and organized "concerned us military service members" don't exist.

An open letter like this is supposed to be signed by a bunch of organizations so that individuals can't be punished. If the "letter" is addressed to nobody and is signed by nobody, then it's not a letter. It's just an anonymous twitter post.

The whole purpose of an open letter is having powerful people behind the message of the letter. Big organizations, famous individuals, etc. Otherwise it just looks fake.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago

I agree that it lacks political teeth without being signed, but if it is real and it continues to circulate among conscientious service members, they could come out later when their numbers are great enough to be politically significant.

No one is more skeptical than I am, but if Aaron Bushnell was willing to set himself on fire in protest, a protest that likely hit much harder to like minded military personnel, then other members are probably willing to write or sign a letter like this.

No one on the side of imperialism would fabricate a letter like this.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

probably like three random lance corporals in a discord server, truly the new American red army

[-] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago

If you are taking the IDF at their word, they are committing a bigger failure than the Fallujah battle that was horrific and a failure and a low point for the US military.

The IDF makes that horror show look GOOD.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago

critical support the troops

[-] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago

I can't believe I'm saying this but... critical support to these US troops?

[-] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago

blob-sleep wake me when its a signed letter by a mixture of grunts and top brass

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

Ok we are murderers but jesus fucking christ israel WTF is wrong with you!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
205 points (100.0% liked)

news

23090 readers
238 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS