I agree with this. There should be an "uncommitted" option on the ballot for all national elections, and if it gets the most votes then the election has to be held again with new candidates.
chapotraphouse
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
As long as people subscribe to the philosophy of lesser evilism, voting "uncommitted" isn't going to make much of a difference as the masses will vote out of fear.
Luckily people are starting to see through the bullshit.
the constitution says legally binding that in that case the government must dissolve and we all must try anarchism for a while.
source: the gnome under my cupboard
that gnome knows his shit. got me through all of my poli sci degree
Like the North Korean system of picking a new guy to run if the previous guy didn't get enough votes (imagine if not voting was a vote for "Uncommitted"!).
When I saw this in my unread this wasn't the context I was expecting
no more half measures walter
Spare Vermin Supreme
I feel like he would be the most vocal supporter of this policy
It's not about winning. It's about sending a messaage...or at least a message that doesn't entail and felony charges.
I read a sci fi novel where politicians got executed if their proposed legislation didn't get passed. They also got merced if they didn't propose legislation
That's a bit too rough... they should be sent to town-style gulags, where they can live normal lives, (eg. labor and self-educate) and atone for their sins in the extreme blistering heat or the crunching snow....
Yes, but in Amerikkka especially the executions should also happen if uncommitted option does not win
seeing that happen would truly give us the most important erection of our lifetime
yes
in the event that this happens the government must contract to forge a new doohickey for the ceremony
That can easily be done by employing one of the many thousands of American tweakers.
...governance by plurality is a pox on democracy...
Liberal democracy isn’t