this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
69 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15681 readers
225 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this.

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

fuck trump but please do it.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 63 points 9 months ago (3 children)

There is no way he actually does this. The national security state would never tolerate any serious attempt at dismantling the foreign policy doctrines that are their officially stated reason for being.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 months ago

what would it even mean? NATO is the US. if the US leaves, NATO goes with it.

it's like threatening to leave your own nose behind.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

He might actually do it because nato officials are also attacking him now. His ego is way too big. He'll Atleast try to do it before he gets JFKed

[–] [email protected] 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

before he gets JFKed

It would be funny if Biden dies during the debate, then Trump gets JFK'd

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

It’s Her Turn hillary

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Why would they go that far though? They have to have blackmail on him for something that he cares enough to not want released. I always imagine these people, being the institutionalists they are, would go for subtle approaches like blackmail when it comes to getting what they want.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They didn’t let him do it during the first term, they won’t during the second.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

That's why I'm confident they won't let him try to do it a second time. I imagine they have to have gotten better at managing his behavior to get the outcomes they want.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

“We were always playing shell games to not make clear to our leadership how many troops we had there,” Jeffrey said in an interview. The actual number of troops in northeast Syria is “a lot more than” the roughly two hundred troops Trump initially agreed to leave there in 2019...

Officially, Trump last year agreed to keep several hundred U.S. troops — somewhere between 200 and 400, according to varying reports at the time — stationed in northeast Syria to “secure” oil fields held by the United States’ Kurdish allies in the fight against ISIS. It is generally accepted that the actual number is now higher than that — anonymous officials put the number at about 900 today — but the precise figure is classified and remains unknown even, it appears, to members of Trump’s administration keen to end the so-called “forever wars.”

https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2020/11/outgoing-syria-envoy-admits-hiding-us-troop-numbers-praises-trumps-mideast-record/170012/

Their method of managing his behavior was simply lying to him lmao

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

That would have to be the first layer, lying by legal word play or omission. There must have been a lot of insubordination from the lifetime bureaucrats during his last tenure to do that. Blackmail could be the next layer, which I would imagine would stop anything else they couldn't get by just lying to him.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And you only really need to pull out stuff beyond lying for issues he's really fixated on, which varies from little to nothing, at least abroad.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Yep. I think it's especially useful for them to have a populist politician that can put his seal of approval on any of their legacy policy proposals.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 34 points 9 months ago

NATO is job creation. Trump says he will help the economy but what about all those Nazi generals he’ll put on unemployment?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 9 months ago (1 children)

the one thing trump and claudia de la cruz can agree on

[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago

Democracy truly is the art of the possible.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 9 months ago (2 children)

is he pushing into "getting grassy knoll'd" territory yet?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 9 months ago (1 children)

that's too funny an outcome to actually happen.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

What about the existing Trump corollary where it sinewaves back into 'certain to happen' territory because it is far too funny (the Trump corollary being him becoming president)

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

Far-future pete won't be able to remember where he was on 11-22-27

[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Trump leaves NATO just to recreate SEATO to go to war with China faster than the dems that want to take out Russia first then move onto china agony-deep

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

SEATO? More like cheeto

[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago

the dang cheeto in the white house is gonna wreck our hegemony, wont anybody think of the economy!

:boohoo:

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

i can never remember the phrasing on that quote about how "the reason for NATO's existence is to deal with the consequences of NATO's existence." i can't find it either.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

I like on trueanon when they said it was to "keep the russians out, the germans down, and the americans in"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

Wtf based trumpet?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

They want so bad for this to become a bigger deal than Joe’s mental decline.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

A Reddit link was detected in your post. Here are links to the same location on Teddit and Libreddit, which are Reddit frontends that protect your privacy.