this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
238 points (100.0% liked)

memes

22386 readers
120 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in [email protected], it's a great comm.

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Does anyone else kinda find it annoying that Reddit is mad that Putin was giving a history lesson? I mean I didn't watch the interview (and I won't tbh) but it seems pretty silly to go after him for providing historical context to the region.

There are other reasons to be mad at Putin and tucker, but this wasn't it.

I saw posts about putting explaining the formation of the earth and the big bang on reddit. It's silly.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Settler colonists are trained from birth to advocate that bygones be bygones because that's the only moral framework under which they can even try justify living on stolen land.

Therefore, other people remembering history is a direct threat to the anglo settler colonists and they will react accordingly.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago

Settler colonists are trained from birth to advocate that bygones be bygones because that's the only moral framework under which they can even try justify living on stolen land.

I never thought of it like that, it makes so much sense why Americans and anglos think that way.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

settler colonists are trained from birth to advocate that bygones be bygones

Ugh I immediately thought of how reporters were asking the victims of the Charleston Church Shooting immediately after if they forgave the killer.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

bygones be bygones

This is countered by "debt comes with interest."

[–] [email protected] 28 points 9 months ago

it seems pretty silly to go after him for providing historical context to the region.

It is silly, but it's also entirely predictable. Since they (reddit libs) have no concept of the historical context, when it is provided, all their shitty surface-level vibes-based reasoning for supporting NATO and Ukrainian fascists starts crumbling. So of course they're going to get upset at being informed of history. It triggers their cognitive dissonance and makes them look like the fools they are.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Liberals are deathly allergic to context, much like how a vampire is terrified of garlic

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

Vampirism is just a virus that's anti-italian.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 9 months ago

I actually enjoyed the history lesson I-was-saying

[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago (3 children)

this is just harry potter brain with a slightly older version of harry potter

[–] [email protected] 43 points 9 months ago (2 children)

angery no its noooooot, harry potter is racist, xenophobic, transphobic, neoliberal propaganda with a terribly constructed world!

Tolkien's work on the other hand is racist, xenophobic, christo-monarchist propaganda with a well constructed world!

... and i kinda like it so you'll find that makes it cool and good 😎

[–] [email protected] 51 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Tolkien as a human outside the book ended up being a good person with good intent, rowling is a fascist with only hate in her heart

[–] [email protected] 36 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah Tolkien felt bad about his characterisation of the Orcs, and despite it clearly having a gentry much of the Shire (Tolkiens ideal society) is appealing to more Agrarian minded Socialists.

And even Aragorn is far from an entirely noble figure, the work is never completely comfortable with an absolute monarch divinely chosen, even a good and non-intervening one.

He's a utopian Catholic basically, sure he wrongly accepts the concept of class collaboration, but that's because he believes (also wrongly) that such a society can be founded on compassion and mutual co operation, resulting in the class differences slowly fading away.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I deeply love LotR but I re-read the trilogy a year ago for the first time as a leftist and as much as I hate to admit it, there’s definitely racism in the book. I don’t think Tolkien was consciously white supremacist or anything, but he was a product of his place and time, and early 20th century England was dripping with chauvinism towards non-white people in that time. He may have felt bad about portraying the orcs as one-dimensional but afaik he never regretted portraying the “evil men” in explicitly orientalist or brown terms.

But I definitely think Tolkien’s socio-political views are wildly contradictory. As much as he seems to love monarchy, afaik he never spoke out in favor of actual monarchs like Elizabeth II having any real power.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

Just to be upfront, I'm a huge Tolkienite and have loved Tolkien since I was a little kid before the movies even came out, so I'm biased. And I'm having a rough night so I may not express this as eloquently and I'm not going to find sources at the moment.

But, I don't think Tolkien's work is racist the way people say and I do believe his, let's say, stances are years ahead of Rowling despite the fact that he was born the better part of a century earlier and was raised a White man in apartheid South Africa.

That being said, he isn't perfect or a Communist. And if you take Lord of the Rings as book by itself, then I can see how you would mostly draw that conclusion you mention. That it's racist and treats the White, Western men as the inherently "Good" men who fight the "evil" hordes of Black and Brown men. But, honestly, you get a much fuller picture if you also read other supporting literature, The Silmarillion as well as The History of Middle-earth, and so on, as well as his personal letters. There is a lot of humanizing and sympathy that happens towards the Haradrim and Men of Rhûn that is pretty tight. And even with Orcs, but I won't get into that.

There is a whole history of how the Men of the West, Aragorn's ancestors, not only were made so evil and corrupt by following Sauron themselves that they dared go to war with the fucking gods, which almost brought about their own utter annihilation, but also that they literally colonized, enslaved, pillaged, and murdered the indigenous population. This history of conflict between Men ("humans") caused so much hatred and resentment towards the West that when Sauron eventually came along as their enemy who promised to bring victory over them that the Southrons and Easterlings naturally allied with Sauron. Not because they were inherently evil but because of the material history. This only later developed into cults of worship, but the same Men of the West made Sauron-influenced cults of worship too so that is not unique either. So, Men of the West aren't in any way the inherently good men of the entire story—nor are Elves for that matter, they have a severely fucked history that is not discussed in Lord of the Rings. It just doesn't get brought up as deeply so people just get this Good v. Bad surface level view in that one book, similar to how taken by itself The Hobbit is just a fairytale but is very different when contextualized in its history. And I just see it as Men of the West already having had their own fall to Sauron's evil and now, because of their own actions, this same evil has passed to the Southrons and the Easterlings. The Men of the West are fighting Sauron, but they are not necessarily fighting the other Men—it's not like there is an attempt at genocide after Sauron is defeated. There is an understanding that Sauron is the true evil and manipulating the other Men—again, Sauron also corrupted the Men of the West and other races and they are constantly fighting the temptation to go back to him so it is not like they are totally above these 'evil' men just for not being under Sauron's sway this time. And even in Lord of the Rings itself you already at least see one humanizing moment with Sam when he and Frodo are in Ithilien and one of the Haradrim falls dead off the Mûmakil (Oliphaunt) and Sam wonders

what the man's name was and where he came from; and if he was really evil of heart, or what lies or threats had led him on the long march from his home; and if he would rather have stayed there in peace.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Oh yeah its pretty racist but much less than, say, Orwell and in some ways less than TH Lawrence.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

no its noooooot, harry potter is racist, xenophobic, transphobic, neoliberal propaganda with a terribly constructed world!

Tolkien's work on the other hand is racist, xenophobic, christo-monarchist propaganda with a well constructed world!

oh damn I didn't know that

I just meant it along the lines of them both revolving around a bunch of mayos in a meadow with random magical crap happening

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

I'll explain why you're wrong later. It'd been a long day.i need to make a Tolkien copypasta for myself sometime so I don't have to repeat myself manually every time this weak shit comes up

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

You'll ruffle some feathers here, but lowkey kinda true lol

[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago (9 children)

@America, can you please retrieve your clown from Russia?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Which one? Putin was America's guy, 25 years ago, when Russia was in danger of electing the communist party.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Joë Biden, Earth Rider of Rohan

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

Whats going on?