I would say 2 is a little early to start Rosa Parks reenactments.
this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
97 points (92.2% liked)
News
23275 readers
4614 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I'd say day care as a whole is too young. If you want to give toddlers a lessons on race, tell them that the 2-year-old black kid is no different from the rest of them. Which is really easy: treat her as no different from the rest of them. Kids, amazingly, learn that lesson just by watching.
I doubt that girl was delivering a convincing performance anyway.
The only tired I was, was tired… from nap time.
That's fucked.
"We need some one to play Rosa Parks."
"Well this two-year-old has the only notable characteristic."
They do shit like this and say wokeness makes them feel bad.
"Being self aware hurts our fee fees!
We deeply regret the assumption that our teachers, our leadership or our administration would in any way choose to make a child feel uncomfortable or negatively singled out.
Assumption? ASSUMPTION????
There were literal photos ffs!!
What a way to blame the parents for the school admin's stupidity.
As long as the class was taught that the 2 year old gained valuable life skills from the incident and should be thankful to her ~~tormentors~~ educators.
Wow, what a purposefully shitty title
What is wrong with the title? Genuine question. It seems to represent the content of the article pretty accurately.
"Florida parents say..." implies that there's a possibility the child wasn't actually restrained.
Compare with:
"2-year-old girl was restrained during Rosa Parks reenactment at Florida day care"
Except that the school denys that the girl was restrained, which you would know if you read the article. So a journalist can't say "2-year-old was restrained" because there's no proof that she was. The only source of that claim is the parents interview and none of that can be taken as fact. Hence, "Florida parents say..."
There are apparrently photos showing the child being restrained by another child in a police vest, which the news agency chose not to share, so it's a little more than "parents said..."
Yes, but if they definitely say she was but the school can somehow prove she wasn’t, they can be sued. That’s why even with photo and video evidence, articles will say “alleged” or “person says,” because it hasn’t been legally proven yet. It’s protection from potential lawsuits and legal liability, not bad writing.
I took it to mean that the child was kept from attending the reenactment, probably for behaving like a toddler at a Rosa Parks reenactment, and restrained inappropriately as punishment. What happened wasn't a whole lot better, but not what the title led me to believe.
That title there is everything that's wrong with "journalists"