this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
100 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15681 readers
225 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this.

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 55 points 9 months ago

"Ukraine mounted a frontal attack into a Russian minefield. Here's why that's genius." Energy.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just utter fuckin nonsense, and these people have the gall to call other people NPCs

[–] [email protected] 38 points 9 months ago

I love that they're still using Steve Jobs on their media. The man has been dead and buried for over 12 years, but his ghost still haunts the minds of these dorks.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 9 months ago

this things selling point being nothing but "a screen you can't look away from" genuinely feels like a tipping point for the way consumer electronics are going

[–] [email protected] 35 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The problem with ar is that it’s promise isn’t improved quality of life for white collar workers, but increased productivity from the skilled labor pool by allowing a carrot and stick approach of huds with condensed centuries of experiential information and an unprecedented level of tracking.

The goal is to make it easier to slap anyone into a position that would currently provide a decent wage by giving them a computer that says “described symptoms indicate probable seal failure” & highlights the bolts to take out in robocop dick shoota vision and then beeps insistently when they’re on smoke break too long.

But they need to develop the technology first, and white collar workers are willing to buy and use the thing but can’t provide the kind of feedback that developers are looking for.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

TFW you know the seal is fine and you can obviously see the cracked housing is leaking, but your face-computer makes you waste 15 minutes fixing the wrong thing. And then it complains you're the one wasting time when your break is 45 seconds longer than the legal minimum.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I see AR being used a lot in manufacturing, and mechanic roles in particular. Boeing, for example, uses Hololens with it's mechanics to simulate airplane repairs.

Microsoft is really the only company targeting AR at the blue-collar worker, while most of the other AR companies target those white-collar workers.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

There’s a lot of bad stuff you can say about Microsoft, but you can say “this is where you need to be, it it’s not gonna turn a profit for a decade.” And they have a better chance of recognizing the wisdom than many other big tech companies.

Fantastic long term vision hobbled by awful short and medium term thinking and an unwillingness to abandon existing userbases.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Maybe it does dox me... we are using AR for power plant related tasks with some components for which we have service contracts with a third party and the manufacturers. Really does increase productivity quite a bit, still in most cases the people 30 years on the job and who know the machines well after decades on them can deal with most, too. However not always and there are a couple of them who do not actually have a mental model of the machinery and they could profit from that, too.

Tools can emancipate us, or be pressures on wages and the labour class. The question is who controls them, how they are used and in most countries also what kind of policies alter their usage.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure if Boeing is a great example of doing good aircraft repair work right now. Maybe they should take the fucking VR googles off.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

They kinda are tho. None of the current issues were caused by improper repairs, and Boeing's mechanics do a fairly good job. Most of the issues either stem from corner cutting in design or shoddy manufacturing. Spirit AeroSystems is the company that made the door and fuselage assembly in the most recent issue. They were originally part of Boeing, but in 2005 were sold to an investment firm.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 months ago

Consumerist copium is some strong stuff when taken with billionaire boot leather

[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

What's the explanation they give?

I looked at this thing last year and it was pretty obvious it's not intended to compete in the VR market, it's intended to be a platform that is used by enthusiasts alone. The intent seems to be to use it to build an app base that will then go on to be the foundation of a mass market AR device that they intend to release later.

If that's the explanation in the video I agree with it. But I dunno, they might have a totally different explanation. The general point is that you can't release an AR device to a mass market by itself with no apps though, so you need a strategy to get apps made beforehand, especially as the Google Glass strategy was already a clear failure.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

Yeah, this is really just an expensive devkit. Pretty sure the Quest Pro had the same idea behind it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

I know a guy who interns at a tech company and his whole job for the last six months was making an app for this thing, so at least some people are trying to get ahead of the curb

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago (3 children)

“The Vision Pro is bad” But that is also good?

I’m tired.

I think it’s a neat/best vr headset, but I think most of the spacial computing stuff is dumb.

Having your emails floating above your desk in the office is stupid.

Useful things for augmented reality - pulling up diagnostic/data on things by looking at them like in a video game. Helping me find the wall-stud and level things.

It’s kind of stupid tech.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You will be able to do enter data into spreadsheets and make sales calls in VR

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It's so fucking funny that you've invented this audio visual immersion pod, completely encapsulating yourself in an artifical world, and the best tool for organizing your work is still just digital graph paper.

The Medicis had "a big dark room full of ledger books" 600 years ago. Now you can live like a medieval Italian accountant for the low, low price of a month's salary.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The people buying this probably won’t be missing that monthly salary. Usually tech reviewers and the dumbest, richest rubes

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

The real secret of Apple's success is knowing the astronomical costs some suburban dork will pay for the newest toys.

Even then, these devices keep getting tried and they keep failing. Better off putting one of those hologram projectors on the next iPhone, tbh. That's something you can show off to your friends, at least.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Stud finders cost like $8, you can probably get a shitty level for the same price, sometimes I just measure from the ground and mark two points with a pencil.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No shit.

But those are basically the use-cases for augmented reality.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sorry I worded that poorly.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

I was posting pre coffee, I’m sorry. your phrase was great. We are on the same page.

The best things people can come up with for the $3500 headset that had millions spent on research.. is.. maybe $20 of stuff.

The tech is Neat, but it’s really only good for entertainment.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I like that a lot of new products now are just inferior, outrageously expensive versions of things that have worked fine for decades or even centuries.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

it's the whole tech foward thing that has gripped many people, where they assume more tech = more better

There's very, very good applications for tech, I ain't exactly conservative about this, but so much of it is just applying computer to problem thats easily solved without computer

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It’s interesting how the AR workspace is easily the most appealing feature for me, yet I see plenty of people see it as silly.

I’m likely a silly person I guess.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

You can do that with windows / meta quest 3.

This is better.

But there are only so many different things you can actually look at before your brain isn’t really looking great.

Or you wanting that space as a work-around for bad UI designs.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago

The counterintuitive secret 5D chess genius archetype and its consequences

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

I absolutely loathe the sensational language all these videos and posts use. Usually the content isn't as bad, but I just hate it. It feels like terminal stage for the English language.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Sweaty? Like "perspires too much"?

Or sweety like "my sweet summer child"?

Sorry, ND and I overthink stuff like this.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

Intentional misspelling of sweety

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

“sweety” used to be a common false endearment to condescend to people on Twitter and people began to make fun of the practice by intentionally misspelling it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Thanks! I appreciate the context. Never would have understood and it would have confounded me.