311
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

If he keeps this up, he’ll drag the entire Republican Party down with him in 2024.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 99 points 1 year ago

To me, this article seems to be arguing that Trump will probably end up in the General election, but will lose by a wide margin because he has become more extreme and has pending legal action against him. I would say this sounds pretty similar to what many argued in 2016, though circumstances are admittedly very different now. What hasn't changed is my lack of faith in a large percentage of the American population who either don't vote or vote in hatred.

[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago

It's weird how people still bring up 2016 like 2020 didn't happen. I get it, we can't know for sure and people got burned that one time. But he's hardly a winner.

[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago

In fact he lost the popular vote both times and the candidates he backed during the midterms lost for the most part. His entire track record is losing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

2016 was pure gift. He was as surprised as everyone else when he won. He's all in now, it's that or prison.

[-] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago

This article was like... if a YouTuber had a journalism job but no training. Pretty hard to read and editorialized heavily.

Don't believe anything you read about the trump machine imploding.

Vote. Don't be complacent.

[-] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago

I sure hope so, but I won’t be holding my breath. Can’t fix stupid and there is a lot of stupid.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

If I stepped on a dog turd and smeared it down the street, would you say I ruined it?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Is Trump the turd and the GOP the street in this analogy? Or the turd is the GOP and Trump the one stepping on it?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

This exact same article was written in 2015.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It is 100% worth remaining hungry, remaining diligent, remaining skeptical, remaining active.

But we are in a very different climate right now. I think the big difference is that unlike 2015, people have actually seen what a trump presidency looks like. There are absolutely republicans that will refuse to vote for him, and he was bad enough that he will drive record high turnout from democrats.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, because the stable genius depended so heavily on his marbles when he won the first time.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

He's losing some marbles nobody knew he had any more.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Uhh, what the hell is this article talking about? His approval has remained steady with both Republicans and all Americans, and even saw a small uptick recently..

Sounds like they’re still operating under 2020 and 2022 logic. Biden is pretty widely disliked nowadays outside his own party and 2024 should in no way be viewed as an easy Dem win.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

outside his own party

That's probably true but that party keeps getting bigger.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

By the survey numbers that’s untrue, in terms of the share of voters. Gallup polls indicate the share of people who identify as Democrats has decreased consistently for about a decade, with a heavier decrease in the past three years.. Republicans have remained consistently lower than Dems, but that margin has shrunk considerably over the past decade. Independents make up the largest (and only growing) share of votes.

Granted, this is just survey identification. I have no doubt voter registrations are much more partisan. But, I’d argue being de facto corralled into one of two political parties due to voter registration requirements isn’t the same as a “growing party”.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

This is a very weird poll

in terms of the share of voters

I would argue that the huge amount of independents is everyone saying that they don't want to be pigeon holed into anything online. No one wants that mail. We'll never know how many R's we've lost to the pandemic either, a lot of those states didn't keep track of the deaths. I would never go on a Biden is awesome tour but he's done way better than I ever thought he would/could. Trump & Desantis are actively and openly destroying democracy. So even if I call myself an independent, it's an easy vote.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

So I hope I don’t come off as too aggressive or anything here, I just want to combat as much of the classic Reddit misinformation while this space is still small

the huge number of independents is everyone saying that they don’t want to be pigeon holed into anything online

That isn’t how a Gallup poll works. It’s a randomized phone survey with elected participation. Now obviously there’s inherent self-selection bias with any such survey, but it’s still at least an indicator of trends. This type of poll is the best for assessing party sentiment, which is what the subject of the article is about and what my original comment was addressing.

We’ll never know how many Rs we’ve lost to the pandemic either

I don’t understand why people started thinking this? States may have done a bad job reporting cause of deaths, but the death still gets reported. Like… do people think there are a ton of unmarked graves in Florida or something?

Excess deaths modeling over 2020-22 means it’s pretty easy to figure out how many people died in the pandemic. Whether those people were R voters can be reasonably predicted from county/demographic makeup, such as this study here..

But to your point, if all we care about is who votes for whom in 2024, we can just survey that too. And surveys from basically every site, R or D funded, have the race at a dead heat with Biden only slightly edging out Trump.. Now as we learned in 2016, polls can be very, very wrong, but they’re really all we’ve got at this juncture.

Again, hope you don’t read this as aggressive, I just want people to be better informed and stop listening to blog posts like they’re legitimate truths.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Can't wait for the whole Republican party to go extinct

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Doubtful. The more he rants and the crazier it sounds, the more his supporters love it. They foam at the mouth for his schtick.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Flood the media with as much insane rambling as you can. That way, when you tell the truth, it still sounds insane.

His supporters will pick what they want from the salad he spits out and eat it up. Meanwhile, his dissenters have to work through it to make sense of it.

He's been playing psych games since day one.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

GOP has been pulling themselves down for decades. Trump is just pointing it out more effectively.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Too bad the democrats cheated Bernie twice in a row.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Nobody cheated Bernie. He just wasn't popular enough to win. My god, move on.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

2016, I agree. He was cheated and could've beaten Trump.

2020? Not so sure. Even Bernie himself admitted that Joe Biden's pro working class policies and bottom up, middle out economic plan was very similar to his. He even said that his campaign team was so glad that Joe Biden didn't run in 2016. Bernie himself stated that Joe Biden was so sincerely for the average working American, that even though Biden was basically "Bernie Lite", he wasn't sure he could win against Joe.

If we look at what Joe Biden's been doing for this country, including passing the infrastructure bills, limited gun restrictions, and the Inflation reduction act, we see that he is kind of "Bernie Lite" and honestly, it's SO much better than Trump, that I'll take it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Lord willing

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I've heard this song before and I'm not dancing to it again

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Article published May 26, 2023

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I have doubts. I can already see a low Dem turnout on the horizon. They need to push the mail-in ballot advantage again now that many are back in the office.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Get some popcorn?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
311 points (93.8% liked)

politics

18881 readers
3814 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS