this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
856 points (95.9% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3102 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The new law that bans gender-affirming care for minors also mandates that adult patients seeking trans health care sign an informed consent form. It also requires a physician to oversee any health care related to transitioning, and for people to see that doctor in person. Those rules have proven particularly onerous because many people received care from nurse practitioners and used telehealth. The law also made it a crime to violate the new requirements.

Another new law that allows doctors and pharmacists to refuse to treat transgender people further limits their options.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 258 points 1 year ago (68 children)

It's almost as if it was never about children???

[–] [email protected] 117 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actually fucking painful the amount of people I had this argument with, hate being vindicated in this way. It was never about the children, it's purely about hate.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It's never, ever about the children. Even abortion isn't about the children. Children are just a convenient and effective red herring.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (9 children)

If Republicans cared in the slightest about children, they would have done something after Sandy Hook other than make up conspiracy theories.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

like the wise man said "if youre preborn youre fine. if youre preschool youre fucked."

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Funny how the same people supporting this law oppose universal school breakfast/lunches, subsidized neonatal/child healthcare, and funding for extracurricular programs.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

only if those programs support minorities. government-funded school breakfasts or lunches, healthcare subsidies, and funding for school extracurricular programs are all A-OK as long as we can make sure it only happens at schools that primarily serve rich white christians.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago

Fascism always needs a Boogeyman

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Pro life...until you're out of the womb... then you're on your own... and get to work!... didn't you hear about the rollback of child labor laws?

load more comments (64 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (26 children)

Form the powerhouse that brought you such groovy hits like, “Don’t Tread on Me” and “Small Goverment Now!” comes a new hip tune by the GOPissfarts:

We Are Slackjawed Hypocrites.

Enjoy their olympic-level feat of mental gymnastics as they spew the barely coherent rhetoric-laced psychobabble of meaningless nonsense while simultaneously trying to justify how “iTs diFfErEnT wHeN iTs aBoUt tEh gAyS*™”

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

it's only hypocrisy if you take the most generous possible interpretation of the things the right-wingers say, not what they so obviously mean

it's always been very clear all along that "don't tread on me" doesn't mean the same thing as "don't tread on anybody". they want some people to be firmly tread upon, and others not to be.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They're coming for your ~~guns~~ healthcare. Next is your contraceptives.

FWIW, they came for your porn in many GOP-controlled states.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Terrible news, of course, but I'd like to thank OP for including a little of the article. It means, in my blog, I can link to this page on Lemmy, instead of linking to the article and all the ads no doubt awaiting readers there...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago

"Blindsided" is incorrect. If you are a minority living in Florida and you're just now realizing that The government is less than amenable towards you then you have been willfully ignorant at best.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

Florida continues the habit of ensuring it hurts every citizen in it's state. Has Florida actually done anything "good" for all of Florida?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They came for the people who were disenfranchised and couldn't vote them out of office.

Now they're coming for you because you could have and didn't.

Nobody deserves to be treated like this, to have stupid bigoted political games played with their healthcare, but if you were okay with it being done to young people, you at least should not be surprised that now it's also being done to you.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

Now, do you really think there are enough trans adults in Florida to vote out the people who created this law? The article doesn't say they voted Republican and I think we can assume they didn't. The reason they used the word "blindsided" is because they say the adult aspects of the bill were never part of the public discussion in the news. Of course they could have sought out the full text of the bill, read it and publicized it themselves. But they probably thought they already knew it was a terrible idea without reading past the denial of care to youths. And even if they had risen en masse to protest both new laws, it would only have further energized the red wing who portray them as evil degenerates undermining society.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (9 children)

What a nasty way to respond to a minority losing healthcare access. It's really easy to sit there and tell them they should have tried harder when you're not the one doing the work.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The GOP in general, and DeSpicable in particular, need to survey the bottom of the Marianas Trench to show those bottom feeders how it's done.

(I hear OceanGate has the perfect submarine to get them there!)

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Like many transgender adults in Florida, he and Lucas are now facing tough choices, including whether to uproot their lives so that they can continue to access gender-confirming care.

Lucas, 26, lost his access to treatment when the Orlando clinic that prescribed him hormone replacement therapy stopped providing gender-affirming care altogether.

But SPEKTRUM Health Inc., the Orlando clinic that prescribed Lucas hormone replacement therapy, has stopped providing gender-affirming care.

“There are a lot of people looking for care that we’re no longer legally able to provide,” said Lana Dunn, SPEKTRUM Health’s chief operating officer.

Florida has the second-largest population of transgender adults in the U.S., at an estimated 94,900 people, according to the Williams Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles School of Law.

While SPEKTRUM has bolstered its mental health services since the law passed, it and other organizations heavily rely on nurse practitioners to provide care.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This comment section is the first time I've wondered why I bothered leaving reddit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If I lived in Florida, I try and get telehealth and mail order scripts from a blue state that with trans sanctuary and healthcare protection laws. There are a number of states where the healthcare provider is protected from evil red state laws.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›