Libs always be pearl-clutching over the commies grabbing power but never mention who they were grabbing power from.
the_dunk_tank
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this.
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
"They just replaced the old elite with a new elite"
Tell me about the old elite
Tell me about the old elite!
Ehm that would be 𝙬𝙝𝙖𝙩𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩𝙞𝙨𝙢 sweetie
actually i was gonna become a marxist but YOU didnt want to do the special words dance to coddle me like a big baby.
You know in China they have the same word for "obnoxious liberal with zero reading comprehension demanding you concede all of their points right away for no discernible reason" and "opportunity"?
Critically
Reactionary
Asshole
Censoring
Knowledge,
Enduringly (resistant to)
Reason
That's the correct use. Absolutely no information was provided to change the other person's mind. They merely insulted their intelligence.
Leftists gotta try harder if they want people on their side.
Only just got notified of this post today.
That's the correct use
No it isn't. Saying someone is wrong isn't an attack, especially not a personal one. If i said he was a reddit-brained smuglord that'd be a personal attack, but not an ad hominem. If i said he was wrong because hes a reddit-brained smuglord - that would be an ad hominem.
We don't even care about the logic nerd debate pervert terms, but we know what they actually mean