sooper_dooper_roofer

blud ur name is literally bowswer

It's true, I was there

heh everything is fine

I remember in 2021 our soil was just better. This year it looks crumbly and like coffee grounds. A lot of Asian jumping worms too, possibly the reason why

the root cause of all racism

when there's so much AI that you don't even have actual human data sources anymore

THE REASON I POST THIS VIDEO HERE
BUSTY BODY...ACROSS THE WORLD

US China India Russia Japan Brazil Indonesia Mexico Germany DesertBritain

So probably less than top 10 most powerful

pachycephalosaurus or micropachycephalosaurus

I still pronounce it "seltic"

He's acktszchyually trying to virtue-signal his whiteness in this post

There are also various native American groups as well as Europeans (Ukraine, Finland) who revere this symbol.

This is something only a Non-White person from a Non-Western country could write lol. Those aforementioned Europeans are called nazis.

They like to create false history about how the Swastika was the symbol of the Aryans (even though it was found in the Indus Valley centuries before the Aryans even existed, not to mention in pre-Columbian Apache pottery, meaning that it has extremely non-Central Asian roots, let alone European)

Yes I have. The genes don't bear it out.

Brahmin ideology stems from the Indo-Aryans of Punjab. And thus the prevalence of Indo-Aryan genes and Indo-Aryan paternal markers tells a very important story.

Brahmins across India, even in Tamil Nadu, are very genetically similar, but have very different paternal markers. The ratio of Indo-Aryan paternal markers is much higher in Bengali and other Gangetic Brahmins (72%) than in Gujarati and Tamil Brahmins (27% and 40%). This is despite their actual Indo-Aryan ancestry being the same (20-25% for all Brahmins)

What does this mean? It means that Brahmins in Gujarat were far more meritocratic and less racist, because they allowed intermarriage of foreign men into their ranks. Almost exactly half of their Indo-Aryan ancestry comes from Brahmin women. This also holds, but to a lesser extent, for the general West and South of India.

Meanwhile in Bengal and Uttar Pradesh, the Brahmins were far more racist, and there is much more documented evidence of female infanticide (which still goes on today). The Gangetic belt of India also coincidentally happens to the poorest and most backward area of India.