638
Oh boy, goodie! (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 154 points 8 months ago
[-] [email protected] 26 points 8 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

My mouse is your mouse (and your mouse is mine)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_NKQ-qoYx84

[-] [email protected] 87 points 8 months ago

Technically this post is illegal until tomorrow, but I dig that.

[-] [email protected] 109 points 8 months ago

It's tomorrow in some places 😂.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago

Yeah but the IP was held by an American Company.

Happy New Year.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Would using a VPN make posting it from NZ illegal right after midnight if the IP is logged from a country not past midnight?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

I love that we're having a whole hypothetical discussion about this. I think the time in the timezone where the rights were held probably took priority over the time for the poster of the image at the time of upload. Regardless of what timezone you post from, it would have been posted before midnight for Disney and the relevant courts.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

That sounds to me like it's probably correct. 👍

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago
[-] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago
[-] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago
[-] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

They used to be

[-] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

Not really. I think it's considered free speech if it's sarcastic or a parody.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago

Free speech doesn't apply to Intellectual Property at all, or rather you're free to say whatever you want but you can still be sued for anything that you say.

What you're thinking of is "Fair Use".

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Thanks for the clarification.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

" If Disney sues, we'll claim fair use...

Ho hi! "

[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

"hi ho, hi ho, it's off to court we go..."

[-] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

And fair use exists to protect free speech.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Yes, the infamous "sarcastic" exception to copyright.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

It's still illegal. This version of Mickey Mouse is still covered under trademark law.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

What do you mean? What part of this infringes on copyright?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Trademark. Not copyright. And the part that is covered is Mickey.

This could also be covered under copyright, since the only Mickey that went into public domain is the one from Steamboat Willie, not this one. I'm not a lawyer, though.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

This is the one from steamboat willy though

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago
[-] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago

As of 2024, Micky is now public domain, at least the variant from Steamboat Willie.

[-] [email protected] 79 points 8 months ago

Show us the hands! Willie, in the public domain, doesn't wear gloves. Mickey, still Disney IP, does wear gloves.

[-] [email protected] 66 points 8 months ago

Mickey is ready for your prostate exam.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

Yet somehow the Steamboat Willie version seems more likely to give you said exam whether warranted or not

[-] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Dr. Steamboat Willie: "Take off your pants and put them on the chair with mine."

[-] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣... got me laughing so hard i woke up my wife in bed 🤣

[-] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

Did she enjoy the comment as much as you did?

[-] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Of course not... weirdos never get satisfaction.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

It's hard being a weirdo...

[-] [email protected] 35 points 8 months ago

Let me clarify, only the Steamboat Willie version of Mickey Mouse characters are in public domain, not the recent versions as Disney holds the copyright. In a few years, more Mickey Mouse shorts will become public domain.

[-] [email protected] 37 points 8 months ago

Personally, I don't give a shit about whether Mickey Mouse is copyrighted or not. What I care about is all the other works that were kept from entering the public domain because Disney was constantly getting copyright extended.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

What's funny is that Disney built their empire largely on public-domain works (such as fairy tales), but when it's their turn to give back, they fight it tooth and nail. Classic getting to the top and then pulling up the ladder behind you.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago
[-] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I've heard an argument that a reason why Disney has pushed Steamboat Willie lately (new intro for Disney Animation films, and a lot of merch) is because copyright law works differently from trademark law. They can still claim a trademark even if the copyrighted work is in public domain. I'm not a lawyer, but if that's not all BS, I don't think we have to worry about anything like this anytime soon.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

I am a lawyer, and that is correct. You can use old Mickey for general purposes, but not as a mark.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Meeh, it's just a joke. It would be an aimmediate downer for me if I was a fisrt time xfce user.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

AFAIK you can only claim a trademark-violation if someone is (for example) selling stuff (so you couldn’t sell stuffed animals that look like an early Mickey for example).

[-] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

A trademark just has to be "used in commerce as a mark". In layman's terms, that basically means distributing goods or services with it as a logo or a name. A stuffed animal could be infringement, but using something a logo for your software is much closer to the classic infringement fact pattern.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

Love this and now I'm expecting wallpapers for my xfce build.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I get it ... but idk if I want Disney on my mind when thinking about xfce

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

XFCE is the Mickey Mouse under the desktop environments?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I hope not...

this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
638 points (97.6% liked)

linuxmemes

20633 readers
782 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS