109
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 74 points 9 months ago

This is an attempt to behead universities by conservative freaks by twisting anti-genocide positions into antisemitism, which might be the most FUCKED thing I’ve seen yet.

“If you don’t support razing apartments full of children then you’re an antisemite!”

Nah, see it’s not about the fact that they’re Jewish, it’s the fact they’re an apartheid state, and they’re committing genocide. This is about their government and their leaders.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

Since when did criticism of a government start being equal to hatred towards the common people of the country?

This is bs. Every question is being shut down by Western media and politician using the antisemite tag.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

It’s a deliberate propaganda position. Israel has no stance other than the weak “its defense” and for a long time they’ve said stuff like this to protect them from any criticism.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

I'm glad this generation is witnessing firsthand how much control Zionists have over public perception.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 9 months ago

Raise your hand if you knew Penn held stocks in Stone Ridge prior to this CEO's statement.

No one? Thought so.

I appreciate their stance and potential action, but Penn's president's statements in no way, shape or form, affected Stone Ridge in the least.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

I don't think i understand. You're saying that since Stone Ridge isn't affected by something they can't pull their support ?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

No. What I'm saying is that no one would have known of their financial support of Penn, until he made it known.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Penn probably knows who pays their bills

[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Yes. Of course they do. But this guy is just using this as a stunt

[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Could've been pissed off over their statements

[-] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

No. They're saying that Stone Ridge has no corporate justification for their actions and this is being done for petty reasons.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Why would they need "corporate justification" ?

[-] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago

It sounds like Magill said some really stupid shit.

In their testimony, the presidents evaded questions on whether calling for the genocide of Jews violated their institutions' codes of conduct.

Penn President Elizabeth Magill said: "If the speech turns into conduct, it can be harassment."

Calling for genocide isn't harassment, according to her. Guess I can go to U Penn and start loudly telling everyone we should exterminate the lesser races and it's fine.

She was asked point blank if calling for genocide was against their rules, and she said "it depends on the context". How is that not the easiest, most softball question? How hard is it to say "absolutely it's against the rules, but I will clarify that I don't believe supporting the Palestinian people is the same as calling for genocide"?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

I think this was an important quote from the article for context.

"In that moment, I was focused on our university's longstanding policies aligned with the US Constitution, which say that speech alone is not punishable," Magill said in the video. "I was not focused on, but I should have been, the irrefutable fact that a call for genocide of Jewish people is a call for some of the most terrible violence human beings can perpetrate. It's evil — plain and simple."

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

That's a fair statement. It's still a bad idea to take a vague center approach when the topic of genocide comes up, IMO. This, of all times, was the time to take a stand.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

Her testimony wasn't very good, but this is literally cancel culture?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

While I'm fully uncomfortable with the influence donors have over these institutions, I also feel like the handling of some of those hearing questions was catastrophic. Lady got maneuvered into giving them exactly the weak non-answer they were fishing for. It's bad all around.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

While I'm fully uncomfortable with the influence donors can wield against these institutions, I also feel like the handling of some of those hearing questions was catastrophic. Lady got maneuvered into giving them exactly the sort of weak non-answer they were fishing for. It's bad all around.

[-] [email protected] -4 points 9 months ago

The rise in antisemitism is really alarming, and the fact that it’s not limited to unserious, conservative trolls makes it even more so.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

The leadership of Israel is insisting that any criticism of them is anti-semitism. Lying has a habit of undermining the seriousness of an accusation and recruits for your opposition.

Most muslims are semites too, and they are being murdered, fired, and blacklisted simply for opposing Israel. Is Israel anti-semitic?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

This rise in anti-Zionism is great though. Free Palestine.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

What about the rise in Islamophobia?

this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
109 points (97.4% liked)

News

22854 readers
3755 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS