Occam’s Razor is that the simplest answer is probably right.
You’re thinking of Hanson’s razor which states:
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
Occam’s Razor is that the simplest answer is probably right.
You’re thinking of Hanson’s razor which states:
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
I will never give this useless fuck any excuse for the intentional murder he committed.
he can’t properly identify risks.
Give me a fucking break.
Is there an OLED tv on the market now that doesn’t just exist to sell ads?
No matter how clear your law is, if SCOTUS doesn’t like it, they can just declare it unconstitutional after the first yahoo with standing sues the government.
How do you propose they parent other people’s kids?
But if you make another hole upstream, how do you allow that to heal? It’d be extra holes all the way ~~down~~ up.
If Ukraine actually did assassinate Tucker, I’d only support them more.
Also would have accepted the rare double contraction “shouldn’t’ve.”
Since when do GOP senators care about what’s “moral?”
Nothing I have done in my career has given me even close to the benefit I got from learning Haskell. I don’t get to use it professionally, but the patterns I learned to recognize in Haskell are everywhere.
Dammit, lol. Autocorrect got me and I didn’t notice.