this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
285 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4661 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m a bit lost… are Hispanic whites latinos too or not?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If you identify as both white and Latino, yes. If you identify as white and Hispanic but not Latino, then no. [In the U.S.]*, Latino is considered a race as well as ethnic identity.

*Edit for clarification

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I was born in Argentina (part of Latin America). My family is all from Spain. Am I considered a Latino? I mean, I’m from Latin America after all. What does being a “latino” implies? Because as someone from a Latinamerican country, I always thought myself as a “latino”. But apparently I’m a white hispanic?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is actually a decent summary that helps with the tendency to conflate race/ethnicity.

To paint with a very broad brush, "white hispanic" is folks with Spanish ancestry and a few other areas, but NOT central/South America (except for Brazil). A lot of it is determined by colonial history (which country controlled which place and when). There are probably a few exceptions or examples I'm leaving out but that's a loose rule of thumb. It gets murky because who is considered "white" is the result of a social construct. Hence why, for instance, Polish/Italian people are now "white" in the US. They didn't used to be considered white.

Racism is stupid.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Racism is stupid.

and the law of the land

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, you're right. It would be valid for you to select Latino regardless of skin color. I'm just referring to how the US surveys are often defined. Latino is under race but there's a separate question asking whether you are Latino/Hispanic.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

There are all range of colors in Latin America. Same thing than in the USA, however, our white people are decendants of southern Europeans: Spain, Portugal and Italy mostly.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Probably not technically Latino, but almost certainly Hispanic

The official definition of Hispanic is something like "almost everyone who considers themselves Hispanic". It's weird, but being raised in Latin America, having a family member from there, or just growing up in a neighborhood with that culture could all qualify you

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (6 children)

So why is Texas a red state?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

latinos tend to be pretty catholic

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plus people who can’t be bothered to vote.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

plus shutting down voting locations in predominantly non-white citizen areas in texas, especially in houston and the areas south of san antonio.

plus shutting down key locations in certain areas of the city throughout every major blue city to make it really inconvenient to vote.

plus understaffing specific locations in certain areas of the city to make it inconvenient to vote

plus a fair number of automatically “accidentally”changing votes on evoting machines in favor of the republicans that, if the person didn’t refuse to confirm and go back and correct choices they made, oops you voted all republican.

plus ken paxton withholding mail in votes because “it would have turned the state blue if the mail in ballots from austin area weren’t blocked.”

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

voter suppression tactics are disregarded by most and especially in texas; point this out only brands you a malcontent.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I looked this up because I thought Catholics traditionally leaned heavily democratic. According to wikipedia, that was the case into the 60s. The past few decades they've split fairly evenly between democrats and republicans, so I don't think that alone i's too much of a driving factor.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Your question assumes that many Hispanic people aren't Republican which is unfortunately not true

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot are catholic, which means prolife. It doesn't matter anything else politically due to abortion being a sin.

Source: in-laws are Hispanic 1st gen illegal (now legal)border crossers who vote republican. I love them, but they can't see past the one ticket item.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'll never forget the news article about one woman who was married to an illegal immigrant, voted for Trump, and was shocked when her husband was deported.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Because Latinos don't vote in huge numbers. There is also this misconception that just because someone not white that they would automatically vote Democrat. Latinos (especially older ones) tend to be VERY traditional and VERY religious. Democrats typically do terrible with those groups. Even with all the shit that Republicans do, some 40% of Latinos swing red (on a national level and I am sure TX is similar).

The only people surprised by this are ones who get all their news from sites like this one or Reddit who have been repeated told the lie that the GOP is solely made up of old white men.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Lots of immigrants from catholic countries that lean conservative. One of the biggest qanon nuts I knew was Hispanic.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you do it like Putin, you could say these parts of the US belong, historically speaking, to Mexico anyway.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Countdown to a certain segment of white Americans saying they are the oppressed minority, need their guns to fend off the 'colored majority,' and need food stamps.... (I think this is already happening with some religious groups) (I'm white - but I do not hold these beliefs!)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If only they would vote more...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Latinos are not in any way a political monolith, and taking them as such is both reductive and a little racist.

Just ask the Cubans in Miami-Dade county.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Same with us Black people, we're not a monolith either. I know many right-wing black people. 80% of us Black Americans self-identify as Christian for instance, so criticism of Christianity really doesn't sit well at all within black communities

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately they typically vote against their own interests and go republican. Of all the Mexican friends I've had I can only remember one not being conservative even though she comes from a conservative background.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It's almost like it's a quasi form of Stockholm syndrome.

load more comments
view more: next ›