this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
100 points (94.6% liked)

politics

19104 readers
3600 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A new report reveals how AIPAC has set its sight on challenging the Squad in the 2024 primaries, as they continue to criticize Israel’s war on Gaza.


One of the biggest political operations in Washington is gearing up to take down The Squad, the Democratic cohort that has heralded progressive policies from the Green New Deal to tuition-free college, throwing major dollars behind primary challengers they believe can unseat them in their 2024 reelection campaigns. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is expected to spend at least $100 million in the Democratic primaries in an effort to knock out the seven “Squad” members, reported Slate. They include Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Ayanna Pressley, Cori Bush, Jamaal Bowman, and Summer Lee—all Black and brown members of Congress who have been vocal critics of Israel’s war on Gaza.

The Israeli lobby’s counter effort will likely only be the beginning of a very tumultuous battle for the Squad to retain their seats. Affiliated super PACs, including the Democratic Majority for Israel PAC and the Mainstream Democrats PAC, are also expected to throw cash at the drive to unseat the seven, who have been outspoken in their opposition to Israel’s occupation and continued military bombardment of Palestine.

The United Democracy Project super PAC has already launched a six-figure ad campaign against Bowman, Lee, and Kentucky Republican Thomas Massie after the trio voted against a House resolution to stand with Israel against Hamas.

And Bush, Bowman, Lee, and Omar are already facing Democratic primary opponents in their districts, still a year out from the election, thanks in large part due to the aggressive recruiting efforts and expenditures from AIPAC.

link: https://newrepublic.com/post/176959/aipac-spending-target-squad-2024-election

archive link: https://archive.ph/InMow

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AOC wrote:

Criticism of the Israeli gov is virtually nonexistent in US politics, but apparently that’s not enough. Gotta spend $100 million to unseat the few who believe in Palestinian human rights & a ceasefire that most Americans already support. The acceptable level of dissent is 0.

Damn woman is spot on. She was good, but I think she's gett8ng better at this.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, i believe human rights should be a thing everyone enjoys. which is why I want Palestinians to get them and have a cease fire. 20 years from now, Israel is going to realize that nothing has changed, they'll still be fighting this on-again-off-again war for reasons only they know.

over a scrap of land.

The only way towards security is through peace. The only way to peace is to give Palestinians a voice and representation, and to treat them like humans that actually matter. Something I learned growing up watching an endless war because some douche bags gave us an excuse.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm glad to give you the vehicle to spout your great oratory, but it has nothing to do with the subject and what I wrote.

Imagine how people would be reacting if a powerful, lavishly funded Muslim lobbying group was preparing to spend $100,000,000 on the 2024 elections to defeat the most Islamophobic republicans in Congress.

As much as I despise the GOP's vicious attacks on Muslim Americans and immigrants from Muslim countries, I still wouldn't want lobbyists representing a foreign power exerting that much influence on our elections

I feel the same way about AIPAC

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Absolutely agree.

AIPAC, ADL. Anyone else bribing politicians (and that’s what it is, really,)

Citizens United needs to be overturned; and all donations logged and public.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they're agreeing with you. Maybe.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Well, agreeing with AoC, yeah. Her position as I understand it is they-palistinians- deserve rights and not being blown up, which I whole heartedly agree with.

Not just because it’s right, but because that’s the only way to end the threat Hamas and assholes like them pose

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

So they want to primary outspoken progressives with more moderate voices? I don't think that's how gerrymandered districts work. They drive both political wings to extremes because that's what stands out in a homogenous crowd.

I can't believe that money couldn't somehow be better spent on forging a lasting peace than seeking cover to commit atrocities and perpetuate violence.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You Won’t Believe How Much AIPAC Is Spending to Target the Squad in 2024

Yes I will.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fascists gonna fash

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Came here to comment on the clickbaity title.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ok. Let them waste their money.

There is a 68% (and rising) support for a cease-fire across the entire US electorate & this is going to backfire.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

It's still bizarre that an "American" lobbying group can openly state that it's acting in the interest of another country while funding political candidates. Imagine an American Chinese PAC openly spending millions on elections to further Chinese interests in US politics.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I wish they were in my state so i could vote for any of Squad members

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

They're wrong. I will and did believe it. They're going up against the mafia of lobbying groups.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

AIPAC is the vanguard of fascism in America