8
I suppose this gives them clearance to now start bombing journalists
Is there any appropos way of saying that one is simply inquiring in a manner they are entitled to so so and on the basis of its currency to the public or whatever stakeholders to whom they consider their audience?
I mean, I'm improvising a response here, but, in the context of targeted killings of dozens of journalists by Israel? In private, until you have absolutely indisputable facts, that would be my thought.
Maybe investigate before hurling accusations.
Known in the trade as JAQing off.
I had the same thing in mind. Implication by bad-faith inquisition.
Is this more of a right thing than left? I know someone close to me who is a smart individual but on occasion I can just tell their insane inquiry was copy pasted from some "news" org or podcast aha?
In short, HonestReporting lied. They have no evidence that the reporters had anything to do with Hamas other than being there when the event happened.
Of course, the group admits to this only after the Israeli government has stated that it's adding those reporters to the "to be killed" list as being the same as Hamas terrorists.
this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
8 points (72.2% liked)
worldnews
4818 readers
1 users here now
Rules:
-
Be civil. Disagreements happen, that does not give you the right to personally insult each other.
-
No racism or bigotry.
-
Posts from sources that aren't known to be incredibly biased for either side of the spectrum are preferred. If this is not an option, you may post from whatever source you have as long as it is relevant to this community.
-
Post titles should be the same as the article title.
-
No spam, self-promotion, or trolling.
Instance-wide rules always apply.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS