this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
235 points (92.1% liked)

politics

19080 readers
3343 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Can we please stop obsessing over the polls when we still have a full year of campaigning to get through? Let's at least hold off until Super Tuesday, okay?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

You don't have to obsess over the polls, but polling data is valuable information for those who vote in primaries.

If a primary voter likes three candidates more or less equally, but one polls really bad and another really well, then that can help make an informed decision to select the candidate with the best chances to win the general.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Except they're not telling us the quality of the polls. I'm guessing a bunch of these are shitty polls.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

"We polled five people at the Fuck Trump Convention if they would vote for Trump. Extrapolating this data, we can see that nobody in America will vote for Trump next year."

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Polling in the US hasn't been super accurate the last few go rounds. That's likely due to the market being flooded with shitty low efficacy polls but it does make it hard to believe news that announce "polling says"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

That's not necessarily true. The polls in 2022 were extremely accurate. The fact that the media created a "red wave" narrative despite the polling is a totally separate issue.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

This polling won't help you vote in the primaries. In the primaries you vote for whomever you feel is the top candidate. Then in the general you vote for the best candidate left. This is just click bait.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or the convictions come in.

It’ll be interesting to see how that changed things. Particularly in Georgia. The “party of states rights” wouldn’t dare break trump out of jail… would they?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Of course they would.

From Francis Wilhoit: “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

https://crookedtimber.org/2018/03/21/liberals-against-progressives/#comment-729288

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Seriously, we are on the cusp of being beating over the metaphorical head with all the political nonsense for the next year...let's enjoy the small moments of peace we have.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, that does seem to be what this guy is saying. The polls indicate Trump would win the primary and is leading or equal with Biden, this guy says otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right. And the only thing that needs to be said about such polls this far out is "talk to me again in six months." We're much too far out to be prognosticating election outcomes based on polling data from yesterday.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I think the polls, at this point, are more for the campaigns to make adjustments and the media to generate content.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

"He's stronger than Biden." "He's weaker than his Republican opponents (none of whom could beat Biden)." "He's strong." "He's weak."

FFS, make up your mind. This is why these polls don't fucking mean shit.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fascism requires that you be strong enough to defend against your foes, while the foes have the power to keep you down.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's true, but this isn't Fascism. This is pollsters coming to wildly different conclusions, hence my frustration at both the disparate polls and polling this far out from the election.

Plus, Trump gets a defacto 30% of the GOP vote, because that's how many of them are his cultists. There is no fucking way he's weaker than his Republican challengers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

GOP pollster. Read the article. The guy is creating propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago

just fucking vote plz

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

Fuck Trump and all, but these polls are asinine click bait

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Can we trust these polls? Feels like 2016 all over again

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lesson from today: If Trump is on the ballot next year, the GOP is looking at a wipeout of epic proportions up and down the ballot. Anyone remotely associated with him in non-blood-red states/districts (and even some red ones) will be fortunate to eek out a win. Republicans can’t win without moderates & independents, and his name is mud with them. Hatred for Trump nationally is much stronger than even peoples’ own economic self interest. Millions will vote against him and the candidates he endorses, even to their own detriment. Today is a harbinger of things to come if Republicans stay on this path.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Nixon fed the base beer. Reagan made it grain alcohol punch, and Bush Jr. broke out the moonshine. Trump is meth. His people will vote for him no matter what.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

😂 I'm gonna copy pasta that 😁

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Feel free. I've been repeating it since 2016...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'd go one step further, and include Wilson giving them bread. He segregated the federal government, refounded the KKK, and erected a bunch of statues of traitors that specifically asked not to have statues of them ever made. Not to mention a shitton of other stuff.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Not sure why this is even being shared. The story is more that this guy who has been wrong in the past is disagreeing with the current polling.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thoughts and prayers 🙏 🌈

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'll take it lmao

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I keep hearing about these young voters who aren't backing Biden in articles I've read. Can anyone share some perspective on what might be the reasoning here?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pollsters have no fucking idea whats going on and just send out regular feelers to a tiny fraction of americans to see how they would vote at that given time, often with loaded questions to help sway the numbers in which ever way they want the result to land.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also younger voters have been shown to rarely respond to polls. Those that do are probably the strongest MAGA supporters that for some reason wear that as a badge of honer. So my assumption is these polls are deeply biased by who is actually responding.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Im 23, I dont have a land line, I don't answer unknown numbers, and I don't do online polls.

I am basically invisible from a polling perspective. I cant imagine its much different for others.

Edit: put 25 for some fucking reason im actually 23. I dont know why I put that wrong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I have a landline and I picked up the phone last week for a poll and promptly hung up so polls to me are polling the weird Americans that would take phone surveys during dinner time

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not that young but I legitimately stopped responding to text polls because I'm not 100% sure a conservative organization wouldn't text out "poll questions" to start building a list of liberal citizens to fuck with.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Former President Donald Trump is the "weakest" major Republican candidate running in the 2024 presidential election, according to GOP pollster Frank Luntz.

The ex-president is also leading or even with President Joe Biden in most polls, despite much of his attention recently being focused on the avalanche of legal issues that he is facing, including 91 felony criminal counts and multiple civil lawsuits.

"I don't understand for the life of me why [Senate Majority Leader] Chuck Schumer and why [House Minority Leader] Hakeem Jeffries do not go to the White House and say, 'Sir, you've been a great president, you've done a good job for us, but it's time to move on," Luntz said.

Luntz incorrectly predicted that Republicans would sweep last year's midterm elections by historic margins, claiming that they would achieve "between 233-240 House seats" and win back the Senate.

In reality, Republicans performed far worse than most political observers predicted, winning back the House by a smaller-than-expected margin and remaining in the minority in the Senate while Democrats picked up a seat.

Many observers, including some Republicans, did attribute the Republican 2022 midterm failure to Trump's involvement, especially since high-profile Trump-backed GOP candidates including Mehmet Oz and Herschel Walker lost races that tilted control of the Senate.


The original article contains 482 words, the summary contains 210 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!