[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

lemmy.world rule 1:

No illegal content, including sharing copyrighted material

c/[email protected] rule 3:

Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles

So c/[email protected] doesn't even break that rule. It's for discussion. Unless you take a very broad reading of not allowing the sharing of resources that could be used to pirate copyrighted material, but that's not an issue anywhere else

[-] [email protected] 128 points 1 year ago

Maybe you shouldn’t even have had your account on the largest server to begin with?

Some of us made our accounts on lemmy.world within a week(?) of its creation when it was tiny (June 5 for me). Doesn't stop it from belonging on mildly infuriating

1829
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/2881638

The largest piracy community is hosted over at [email protected]

lemmy.world has blocked it. It appears to have also blocked [email protected].

If this is a problem for you, I'd suggest migrating accounts using LASIM to an instance that doesn't block it (such as lemm.ee).

edit:

An official announcement has been made:

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It all depends on context, imo. People should generally leave other people's private property alone. But if it's an ugly cinderblock wall downtown, some kind of drab piece of infrastructure, and the graffiti artist is actually making an effort to make it look good - it can be public art

105
I'll be back (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

If everyone were a gardener no one would need a warrior

553
not my president (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1228
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
251
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
21
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
2
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
4
jackin off (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
131
jackin off (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
he said that (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't have an answer to your actual question other than self-hosting. But, I doubt you'd ever get a "firehose of trash" on your main feed. Mainly because the trashy instances aren't that populous, so I doubt their posts would be active or hot enough to float to the top. But I could be wrong.

You could always go directly to the instance you want to read and lurk. Unless you make an account you won't be able to comment, but you'll be able to get your firehose of trash

Edit: Just be mindful of how much you consume, you'd be surprised how easily hate can invade your mind. To this day I still have to self-censor every now and then thanks to the hateful rhetoric I grew up around, even though I'm long past it

57
he said that (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

But everyone was so much thinner back then. The average person was so much hotter.

Because they inherited an economy with actual food and replaced it with "food" filled with industrial inventions like corn syrup

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Economic liberalism is the economic theory of both American parties. Idk how it came to be applied to only the democratic party but that's incorrect. OP is presumably critiquing economic liberalism from a leftist perspective, of which the Democrats are not

65
give us peepee rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Yeah even if this is a new new account of the same user, we could do without the why haven't they been banned yet. I think we can all agree it takes time for the admins to notice these things - and they're volunteers anyway. They need some leeway

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

witty commentary on current issues

Am I the only one who doesn't enjoy the twitter-takes? Don't get me wrong, I actually agree with most of the takes. It's just that it all feels like they're trying to one-up each other with the cleverest gotcha and it makes me roll my eyes. Maybe I'm just not the target audience for a twitter/mastodon style community

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

I'd just log off lol

[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Yeah after getting used to the not-totally-assholes community of lemmy I'm not going back to reddit. The community there kinda sucks

[-] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago

It's pretty insane the amount of work they did for free. I never even thought about the effort that went into a sub like that. Good for them

view more: next ›

DudePluto

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF