430
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

What do you mean if your brain works in digital time. This doesn’t translate for me and I grew up with regular clocks and wrist watches. All time is the same. A clock with both hands facing 12 is and always has been twelve o’clock. Clock face or digital clock. They give the same time. Comparing two devices that give the same information in different ways to language is absurd.

Your comparison could work if the subject being discussed was 12 vs 24 hour time keeping. Then there is a translation between the two.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

Analog clocks lend themselves better to thinking in fractions of an hour or day, like this post is talking about, as an hour and a half day are both represented as a circle

Digital clocks lend themselves better to thinking in terms of number of minutes and hours directly. When working numerically, fractions of 60 are generally less intuitive, and fractions of 12 often so as well. Most people who don't work with angles often think of fractions in terms of percent, or powers of two.

"Quarter past" kind of tweaks the brain wrong when a quarter is intuitively 25.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

fractions of 12 are unintuitive

Really? I've always found them very pleasing.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

They chose 12 precisely because it's easy to divide!

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

I wish our numeric system was base 12 instead of base 10!

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

You're on Lemmy, of course you like fractions of 12. It is a very convenient base, having so many factors, but most people don't think like that

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That might be the most obscure stereotype I've ever read. 😆

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

It’s also precision. I think this is the biggest thing we’ve lost is some expression of precision.

  • 11:45 from a digital clock is very precise. You expect something at exactly that time, and get more impatient with vagaries of traffic or delays or clocks that aren’t synched, or just that people aren’t digital
  • “quarter of” implies less precision. If I have to wait five minutes, you’re still not late. Regular human activity in the real world is not exact so allowing for inaccuracy is both less stressful and more practical
[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Actually a digital clock with both hands pointing at twelve is not a digital clock.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

oh i think this may be a cultural thing, here in europe when we say "digital time" we specifically mean 24-hour time because "AM/PM" isn't used here.

It's the difference between saying "dinner's at seven" and "lunch ends at 13:30"

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Ahhh!!! That totally makes sense. I took the comment to be about digital clocks specifically vs analog clocks. Not about the type of time keeping. Then the translation analogy totally makes sense and works! Gotta love learning new things from people. Thanks Swedneck!

this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
430 points (95.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

29225 readers
701 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS