United Kingdom
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
view the rest of the comments
While it clearly points him as an idiot. Who likely is unqualified mentally to evaluate evidence.
I do not see that the existence of the climate crisis or not. Has any relevance on the case.
The case is entirly about if the right to protest allows for intentional property damage.
The right to protest is not in anyway effected by the truth of your argument. Climate change disbelievers have the same right to object to government actions as do believers. Truth has no effect on the right to show disagreement. Just hopefully the willingness for other to listen.
The only point the judge should care about is dose that right allow a protester to damage another person's / organisations property.