chapotraphouse

13198 readers

375 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

186

RIP @InevitableSwing (hexbear.net)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 40 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It was unanimous to put him on the ballots

[–] [email protected] 45 points 8 months ago (2 children)

While the decision was unanimous, the liberal justices wrote a sharp concurrence that accused the conservative majority of going further than needed

Oh, my. Hohoohohooooooyhooasfoohooasfoi;jmsdkl;fmn iwaek ln sdaf oh shit.as.d fasdf'ojka;sdmkaf kjasdfiiidiiiiiiiiiiii oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooasd

[–] [email protected] 43 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I have never read a harder cope sentence than "sharp concurrence". Like we make fun of these people for fetishizing losing and dissent, now they fetishize agreeing? What the actual fuck lmao?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I like etymology and looking things up. But I don't think I even did a quickie google of the judge/justice use of "concurrence" because legal shit can be so tedious.

---

Nina edit

TIL - there's something even more lib than a "withering dissent". A "sharp concurrence" is the most lib thing possible. I thought a concurring opinion might be complicated. Nope. It's very simple.

Concurring opinion

In law, a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different (or additional) reasons as the basis for their decision.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"A sternly unpleasant glare" dennis-stare

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Sotomayor Raised an Eyebrow after EVERY Ruling by Supercilious plays.

---

supercilious [] Etymology: early 1500s from Latin superciliosus "haughty", from supercilium "eyebrow".

[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago

But they agreed dissidently!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

RIP in peace old friend

[–] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I better become a malevolent ghost so I can haunt Israel or there will be hell to pay!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Anyone know any good necromantic rituals?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

juche-rose how do we not have any juche necromancy emojis with all the fucking memeing we do about it

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago

Sometimes we must be the change we want to see in the world

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I was honestly gonna guess 7-2 or something like that, with the dissenters arguing about how being impeached should impact legal ability to run again or something similar and technical, but without real standing

Liberals continue to be more pathetic than expected