48
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 41 points 6 months ago

This campaign is about the primaries, not the general election. They have not told anyone to vote for Trump.

The Dems took voters for granted in 2016 and got what they deserved. They should be thanking this campaign but shooting the messenger is so much easier, so they won't.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It’s funny to hear all the crybaby dnc sycophants who support genocide saying the same dumb talking points again and again.

I’m starting to think they are bots, because it would get boring just saying the same stupid shit over and over again.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

You can directly say you're voting for Biden in your comment, and they'll still screech that you want Trump to win.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

That’s ok, I regularly screech like a wild banshee lol. This is a silly anonymous online discussion forum.

But yea, the circles the blue no matter who keep running in are laughable.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Its an election year, I guarantee there is significant astro turfing going on in the fediverse. I'd stake my bank account on it.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Sincerely asking what do you mean by astroturfing? Bots? Paid commenters? Something else?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Any combination of those, and including things like vote manipulation with lots of sock accounts, as well as the posting of links that advance their agenda. Wouldn't take much at all. You obviously need to make it look natural, it's not every comment or post on lemmy that gets hundreds of upvotes or downvotes. I'd wager you can significant alter lemmy feeds with like thirty co ordonated accounts so long as you stay on new or hot. The trickier part would be not using the same 30 accounts every time, but even still those numbers are peanuts compared to what troll farms and botters do on other social networks. Compared to that you could probably just loose a few interns on the whole of the fediverse if astro turfing was your goal.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Biden is super awesome! (Just to see)

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Lmfao, expirementing, smart. Ill abstain from voting to help continue it.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Who the hell supports genocide? If we don't vote for status quo Joe we get Mango Mussolini who's not only bad for the us he's bad for the world... He literally only cares about himself

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Who the hell supports genocide?

Joe Biden. That's why 100,000 Michiganders just voted "uncommitted".

Also Trump, but the only people who want him to win are Republicans.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

Indeed, but the comment was aimed at "crybaby DNC sycophants" as in anyone who is voting for Biden was somehow for genocide.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I mean, that’s what you’re voting for

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

You're right! Sorry, I'll ~~throw my vote away~~ vote green and accomplish absofuckinglutley nothing but at least I can pat myself on the back and Stay Pure™ while the country burns around me!

[-] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

You can vote your conscious. That’s what these people are doing.

They will not vote for Biden unless he is against genocide in words and action.

People are taking a stand. They will not vote for a genocide supporter.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

I’m convinced they’re bots, lots of telltale signs of GPT in the style of prose.

[-] [email protected] -4 points 6 months ago

They have not told anyone to vote for Trump.

They told them not to vote for Biden, which is much the same.

The Dems took voters for granted in 2016 and got what they deserved.

65,853,514 voted for Clinton, over 2.8 million more than voted for Trump.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

You forgot to quote the bit about this being the primaries, not the general.

And you're going to have to explain how Clinton was a desperate underdog in 2016 if you want to imply that actually, she did well.

“For every blue-collar Democrat we lose in western Pennsylvania, we will pick up two moderate Republicans in the suburbs in Philadelphia, and you can repeat that in Ohio and Illinois and Wisconsin.” -- Chuck Schumer 2016

And they still haven't learnt anything.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

They told them not to vote for Biden, which is much the same.

no, it's not. i expect to have at least 4 options on my ballot, possibly 5 if my donations to cornel west accomplish anything.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

And I promise you, all but 2 of those options have a 0.0000% chance of winning. Like it or not, that is the system we have.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

i think i saw it was more like 1/500 so it's more like 0.2%. at least that's what the betting odds called for stein and west, who are the only two candidates i see that deserve my vote.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Jill Stein, friend of Putin who Russians pushed for to help Trump?

And, no, those odds are way too high. Ross Perot was the last big 3rd party candidate, and he managed 18.9% of the vote. He got zero electoral votes.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Speaking to The Intercept in 2017, she said the notion that it was an "intimate roundtable" was "mythology," and that Putin and his associates "weren't at the table for very long." Stein said that "nobody introduced anybody to anybody" and that she "didn't hear any words exchanged between English speakers and Russians" due to the lack of a translator.

from your first link

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

But why was she there in the first place?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

it was the tenth anniversary of a media outlet that gave her more time than probably all American media combined. she paid her own way. it's a nothing burger

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

And what media outlet is also inviting Putin? You are burying the lede that it is Russian State TV, RT. Kinda proves my point.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

that's not proof: it's innuendo

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Oh, please. Why hide that it was Russian state media? You know it smells to high heaven.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

a media outlet that gave her more time than probably all American media combined

Yeah, no deception or spin there. /s

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

you asked why she was there. its state affiliation wasn't relevant to the answer, but it is a well-known fact.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

those odds are way too high.

then you should take the bet.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

What, bet $1,000 to win $0.50 that 3rd party candidates will lose?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

no, take 50 cents from anyone who thinks your wrong

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

your second link contains actual lies or facts that have changed since it's publication.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I don’t think so. Stein is a Russian agents.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

you can't prove this, mostly because it's not true, but partially because there isn't any proof

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
48 points (68.2% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3036 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS