Technology

37712 readers

164 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Recommend me a decent but cheap NAS (beehaw.org)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Ideally one that can use more than one disk so that i can expand it later when i can. Have some minimal experience with Synology since there's one at work and i have interacted with it a couple times and like the interface, but am not married to any brand as long as it works.

Located in EU if it makes any difference.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You can also put an LSI SAS raid controller card flashed into IT into a PCI slot and use SAS to SATA cables. Can easily find them used on ebay for reasonable prices. And if you really grow your server, you can transition those SAS ports to point to a JBOD array with SAS ports, although that takes you from "cheap" to "cheap when compared to buying new."

I'm also a fan of Unraid since it makes expanding the array much easier, but you have to pay for it, and it's designed with the assumption that the only thing you're doing on the bare metal is storage, and everything else is either containerized or in a VM.

Edit to add: As mentioned in the comments below (thanks u/[email protected]) it's usually preferable to use software RAID, not hardware RAID, unless you know for sure you need that kind of performance, and if you're asking about a cheap NAS you don't. Flashing LSI raid controllers over to IT mode makes them pass through any attached discs, so it's an easy way to add SATA ports when you're running out of them on the mainboard.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Unless you have some really high throughput needs, or are putting it in a real weak computer, I recommend software raid like zfs. No need for a real raid controller unless you just need additional sata ports. Heck, even synologys prefer software RAID these days and they have atom or arm processors.