this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
827 points (95.1% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9880 readers
1805 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 91 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The real boring dystopia is the radical car-centrism of having a drive-thru at all to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Try having small children; drive through a can be a lifesaver because you don’t need to unbuckle them, get their winter clothes on, get them into the restaurant, wait in line, order the food to go, then wait for the food, and then reverse the steps to get back into the car. It’s a giant PITA to just get some French fries, chicken tenders, and carrot sticks, let alone the drastically increased exposure to germs associated with a crowded restaurant. You may have heard, there’s a pretty bad wave of Covid, influenza, and RSV right now. Not sharing air with other people is a big part of staying healthy right now.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You're assuming to get to a location you need a car, that's still car-centric design. If your primary argument for drive-throughs relies on the fact that you needed a car to reach the location in the first place then you're missing the problem.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (4 children)

The person's point stands if they were on a bicycle. You can't just leave a child in a bike carrier at the bike rack.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Not after that chewing-out by the police department, I can't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Can you imagine doing such scary thing as WALKING?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

New american aristoracy I guess?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I mean their only point is really if the kids didn't have their "winter clothes on", which would be pretty unlikely on a bike, and I would think in a car, for the most part. I guess it depends where you're going, but that still seems like it would be a good idea, just before you leave the house, generally. I don't think walking into a restaurant, for maybe the minute from the parking space to the door, is going to be a more substantial amount of time, that you would have to have your "winter clothes" on for, compared to if you were entering any other building. I dunno, the tradeoff might be easier in terms of like, without winter clothes, it's easier to get your kids to go potty or change them, but that's kind of a moot point anyways, because most honda odysseys don't have toilets in them, and restaurants do.

Waiting in lines is going to be a problem regardless of whether or not you're in a car. It might be easier in a car, since you have more direct control of your children, but if you're walking, a stroller would be the best analogue for that, and you should probably have that anyways, if you're taking your toddlers for a walk.

It's also not as though walkable restaurants can't necessarily have outdoor ordering windows, hole-in-the-wall style, maybe helping to prevent the flu or what have you. If that's a major concern, though, I think a mask would be a bigger help. Maybe not for kids, they're kinda too gross for that. You could probably leave a kid inside of your little kid bike trailer, or kid's seat on the back or whatever, while you walk up to the hole in the wall and order your food, since they're in view the whole time, and that wouldn't be very inconvenient. I would think the only problem would be if you were going inside. There are some cool options for bike trailer strollers, if you wanted to just detach your kids from your bike, and then just like, go straight inside, but that's kind of a hassle, I haven't seen a good one since they all have to be overbuilt bike trailers first, and strollers second. Someone might make a good amount of schmoney if they could really nail that concept.

In any case, all their points are moot and bad and cars are bad and dumb.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago

Putting a child in and out of a bike carrier is a ton easier compared to a car seat. It's not really an issue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Shhhh we’re hating on cars now, it doesn’t matter that they’re a massive utility the improves the day to day life of millions upon millions of people. Also, we don’t do kids here. Something something capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Bring on the people movers and the monorails; I’m here for it, but I don’t want to get Covid again and as much as I despair of humanity, I have kids and so do millions of others so we should be working together to make a better world for current and future generations.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Maybe but if I had a choice between the two drive thrus would be out of here

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I respect your perspective but as a parent, trust me, life is really freaking hard as it is. Making it harder is unconscionable.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not trying to downplay the right to your opinion but I feel like there has to be a better way to allow parents to enjoy options while also not making restaurants hostile to pedestrians

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I absolutely agree with making more places pedestrian friendly, I just think a drive through makes too much sense to dismiss out of hand. Heck, I’m in favor of walk-up windows to better serve those of us who don’t want to go inside a restaurant even without kids.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I just don't see how a pedestrian friendly place of business and a drive through can co-exist. Open to being proven wrong but as I see it, anywhere that incorporates a drive thru adds at least 3 areas where traffic intersects with customers in a dangerous manner: at the beginning, around the store and the unavoidable blind spot when leaving.

Not trying to take away from your ability to enjoy these things I just don't think they are a good solution to a public place, as with anything car centric.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I don’t have images readily available, but there are little shopping centers surrounding parking lots where pedestrians go right from the sidewalks into the various restaurants/shops, if you can imagine a U shape for the shops and the parking lot and vehicular entrances inside the U. It just takes some planning and extra space, and you know, capitalism isn’t a huge fan of “wasted” space that isn’t generating revenue.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

You may have noticed already that I disagree with your reasoning for using a drive-thru, but you are not wrong that they make life easier, and I'm not even saying that you shouldn't use them. I'm just saying that kids can handle a brief bit of cold.

As a person who became disabled a few years back, I wish many, many more places would have drive through or order and pick-up without having to get out of your car. It's a valuable service. I just think it's over utilized by people who don't need it, which is bad for the environment and not great for how little exercise people already get (walking from the back of the parking lot is not the end of the world, people).

The pandemic was kind of a lifesaver for a lot of us. Suddenly delivery options and order for pickup options have become available where we used to have to struggle to go into these places. It's great. It's not great for the environment or for most people's health, but it's great for those who really need it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Sonic works well without the drive through needed.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It was more military focus than car focus. While in uniform the military isn't/wasn't supposed to run errands essentially, so they couldn't get out of their cars. McDonald's introduced the drive thru so that soldiers could grab a bite to eat without exiting their vehicles. Not that that is any better, just the reason that the first ones were even a thing.

Everyone else installing the things is definitely car-centric.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Damn, that's the worst unintended consequence since employer-provided healthcare.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Employer provided healthcare happened under the Nixon administration, so this happened before that in the 50s

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Employer provided healthcare started as a benefit during WWII because it was a loophole around wage controls.

https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/why-is-health-care-expensive-wwii-wage-controls/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I worded it badly. While it's true that is when the process started, Nixon changed healthcare so that it could be for profit, which it wasn't prior to that, thereby ensuring that healthcare and employment would permanently be tied together

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I was going to a local place until they shut down out of nowhere that had basically the same thing as a drive thru, but for foot traffic (you could go inside, or you could go to the side of the building and order from a window at the sidewalk). I could imagine even in a fully walkable city that you can't drive in would have "walk thrus."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

One of my favorite fast-food joints when I visited the states was Checkers. It was only walk-through and looked horrible to work in (Shed-sized building but one kitchen), but I liked the concept. It was easy to wander up, order food, chill, then maybe wander off somewhere else.

Without any cars to access or even reliably park (??), it was relaxing. A small slice of walker's paradise where all of the scenery catered to our eyes instead of condensed seating areas surrounded by idling cars.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Weird. Checkers is usually a tiny building which is entirely geared toward drive-through orders and is rather pedestrian unfriendly in colder weather because it is all outside ordering and dining if you don't want to use the drive-through.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Even weirder, because where I am every checkers is in a gas station, with a drive through on the side of the building. If that isn't as car-centric as it gets, just shoot me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

This is the part I don't get. I watched Chick-Fil-A build a new restaurant. Required all kinds of crazy drainage engineering to get into the corner of a larger parking lot. But throw in a covered drive-through on top of that? Absolutely not. They did build a kiosk for the drive-through, but could have just as easily built a second drive-through window and called it a day.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

There's a small local burger chain by me which does this. They have a small hut for their restaurant, no inside seating. Drive-thru is on the right and walk-thru is on the left.