197
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 41 points 8 months ago

It's also disingenuous because they already decline to host sex workers newsletters. So if the censorship angle was true, they're already censoring.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

RIGHT. Thank you for pointing this out.


:::

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Right, and if the profit motive angle were true, they’re already violating that by censoring the sex workers you just mentioned.

So that eliminates profit as the reason for their actions here

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
197 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37568 readers
679 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS