this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
397 points (96.7% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2598 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Chinese company. No idea what disability discrimination laws they have in place, if any.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Fair (and I'd actually just come back to edit that I realise this isn't in the US), but the point still stands - this is blatant discrimination, no matter where it's happening..

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For sure. I'd be first in line to complain if I worked there... assuming my mobility impairment didn't get in the way of that 😅

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Lol, same.. 😬

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

ADA only requires "reasonable accommodation". A couple alternatives to running were presented, indicating the company is willing to cooperate with the specific needs of workers. That the article fails to mention any specific accommodations for handicapped workers does not mean that such accommodations won't be made.

A blanket policy covering all disabled employees is not ADA compliant. Accommodations are supposed to be made on a case-by-case basis, based on the specific needs of the specific employee. Without knowing the capabilities and needs of a specific employee, we cannot determine what would constitute a reasonable accommodation.

Yes, strictly applying this policy to disabled employees would be discriminatory, but there is precisely zero evidence suggesting that it will be applied that way.