this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
130 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37809 readers
201 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Yeah because I'm sure GM's shit will be better. Idek why I'm addressing this: ~~we all know GM doesn't want to pay Apple or Google~~. That this is really about more renting and never owning. They just want more money.

GM, just say that. We know you're a gigantic money-hungry corp. You all don't have to lie and pretend to care about safety. We're not a bunch of idiots. We get it, even if you all suck for doing this.

I'd say I hope GM crashes and burns again, but then the government will just bail them out again.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I thought Android auto was free.

This is all about maintaining and selling your data for themselves. There was just a report out last week about how cars are one of the most data insecure devices you can own because of how poorly all the big auto manufacturers treat their customers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Do you mean Android Auto, or Android Automotive (what's being used here)?

I assumed/got the impression that the latter cost money to integrators (GM) but I guess I don't know for sure.

Android Auto is "free" to end-users but is different.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah I stand corrected on the Android side. I assumed there was some licensing going on. I'll correct that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I believe there is, for Android Automotive.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I read that article too. They know when you've been recreating Shakespeares "beast with two backs" in your car. Creepy stuff.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

We know you're a gigantic money-hungry corp. You all don't have to lie and pretend to care about safety. We're not a bunch of idiots.

Alas, as long as there is doubt, there are a large number of suckers who are willing to give the benefit of the doubt. We are a bunch of idiots, collectively. That's why shit like this works.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I doubt it’s about paying Apple or Google, so um much as their ability to extort car owners to pay them. Nobody in their right mind will buy the $10/month Bullshit Subscription (TM) from GM when they can just plug in their phone and use Waze.

Edit: seems Apple doesnt charge automakers so it’s definitely about extorting you for money.