this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
532 points (87.7% liked)

Asklemmy

44152 readers
1343 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lack understanding and life experiences

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which would end in...?

You go in the booth, it's Option A or Option B. You fill in the box. Nobody cares why.

What you've said here is a meaningless non-answer based on culturally ingrained prejudice.

In reality, we already don't require old people to actually have or demonstrate either of those things.

Sheltered people and hermits aren't denied the vote. They don't have to have experienced anything but the passage of time, regardless of how little they've filled it with.

People who watch lies on purpose aren't denied the vote. They might have no understanding but misunderstanding and still are able to steer the course of the country based on delusions and propaganda.

Think of every garbage politician you've seen get elected. All the damage they've done. And realize that old people elected every single one of them.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which would end in...?

Even dumber shit than we now have

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At this point I have to conclude you're not ready to address this conversation in good faith.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are arguing for 12-yo voters.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least you followed that far.