this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
1089 points (99.0% liked)

Memes

45635 readers
1128 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (3 children)

that might be the novelty value of it but I doubt it cost much when it was new.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't think anyone was arguing that...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, an argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, I'm not allowed to argue unless you pay.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But I just paid you just now!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

No you didn't.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago

It was a limited edition promo release, so it's definitely a collectable now.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Also as CRTs become more and more rare as more of them die off and new ones typically aren't manufactured anymore, it's not surprising that the prices are just skyrocketing lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

For some reason I find it weird that Shrek coincided with CRTs. Not sure if it's because I tend to think of Shrek as being more recent than he is, or that I think CRTs stopped being used earlier...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

I think it's because CRTs seem like such a thing from the 80s, and Shrek is more recent than that, but Shrek and CRTs were both fairly common in the early 2000s.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why would anyone want a CRT TV though? We used to prefer CRT monitors for gaming because they had faster refresh rates, but that's not really an issue for television, and gaming monitors have superior refresh rates now.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

For older retro-style game consoles, a CRT still provides a better display experience, on LCDs you get smuging/bluring that just wasn't present on CRTs for these older consoles. An LCD etc just doesn't do them justice the way a CRT does.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Oh that's true. I tried to play some old Nintendo games on my Switch, using my 65" OLED flat panel TV and it was horrible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They're not really rare. For example, here in Brazil, it's just a common thing in houses to have an old crt lying around, sometimes, still in use. People sell them for really cheap, or just give them away (since they're heavy, a lot of people will gladly give you one, or two, for free if you simply go there to take it). Even in a country where crts are rare, a collector could simply import one from a place where it costs almost nothing.

Crts may be old, but they were manufactured in millions, making them not really valuable, because they're not rare. Same goes for things like floppy disks or coins from periods of huge inflation. It will take a loooong time until we see crt prices skyrocketing due to scarcity. Prices may have gone up a little in some places, but not that much.

As for the shrek one, like people said, it's because it was a limited model.