this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
358 points (95.7% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2092 readers
220 users here now

A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 111 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Maybe a controversial take.. I like Snyder's ending better than the book.

Ozymandius tricking Dr Manhattan into building a bomb that blows up NYC is a lot more grounded in possibility that a giant psychic squid.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They’re both products of their times. The squid made sense in a time where comic books weren’t as grounded as they are today.

Also a squid makes more sense when you actually foreshadow a squid. The movie would have had to shoehorn that in through the plot and that would have been a mess.

It was cleaner. Different medium, different capabilities.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't see how foreshadowing improves anything. Ozy explaining his bizarre and horrible plan and then revealing it's already happened is a wonderful moment. Knowing it's going to happen before it does would ruin it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Foreshadowing the squid is well done in the comics and does not change the reveal. You should read it if you haven’t.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I've read it many times but I'm sure I missed 90% of the meaning. Just seemed like people want it to be telegraphed when I assumed the novel ending was intentionally shocking and weird.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Have you watched the HBO show? The squid totally works.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

I want more of that HBO show. I hope they can do more storylines from that timeline.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Still heavily contrived against a much cleaner approach. It works, but the Manhattan line was better.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The whole Dr Manhattan plan could've blown up at his face though if he took it personally and killed everyone.

I do kind of like the squid ending because it's supposed to be something completely unexpected and unbelievable that governments would actually believe it's an alien. They could've foreshadowed it a bit better but I like the weirdness of it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I like the TV show fleshing out the squid thing more. I think the movie ending was fine for the time though.

I remember recommending the movie to people and being told "you should have warned me there was blue penis" by one person. And then he went on to say "blue penis" at random times when he saw me. I don't know how he would have reacted if there was a giant alien psychic squid attack

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Yeah, while the movie had its flaws, notably pacing, my wife and sister lost it at "big blue penis," and I was like, "what? THAT was what you focused on?"

I still felt the movie was pretty true to the message and had some memorable scenes and lines.

“None of you seem to understand. I’m not locked in here with you. You’re locked in here with me!”

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I saw that movie and recommended it, with a caveat. I said, "It's a great movie, but there's a lot of big blue schlong. If that's a problem for you, you won't enjoy it. If it isn't, it's a great show."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"If that's a problem for you, you missed the message."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Seriously. If that's a problem for you, maybe put in some work and join the rest of us in adulthood soon.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The ending works a lot better, agreed. But most of the beginning and middle bits change the tone/framing/emphasis/etc to give the exact opposite meaning to what was originally intended. Biggest example I can think of is the opening battle between the Comedian and ~~Ozymandias~~ the mysterious assassin; in the graphic novel that fight is framed as a dying, bitter alcoholic well past his prime getting absolutely bodied in an unceremonious and fitting end to a despicable man. In the film, sure he loses in the end but it's a much closer fight and he goes out in a blaze of glory, defiant to the end, quite literally a hero's last stand. Snyder also does his best to make Rorschach look as cool as possible (while still being grungy and uncouth) instead of how he is in the graphic novel: psychotic, extremely antisocial, and borderline fascist. Again, the change to the ending was a good choice, but there were many other choices made that I personally completely disagree with

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Fully agree! the show undoes some of the damage (but brings back the squid)

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

The ending was equally fine as the book, the main issue I have is that in the book, the only real super powered person was Dr. Manhattan.

A lot of things don't make a ton of sense having all the heroes have super strength and durability.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

It was the style at the time. Even Asimov got into psychic phenomena for Childhood's End.

Compare the 90s obsession with cryogenics, or every stupid variation on "10% of your brain."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not controversial at all, it works and plays better.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

It's just the rest of his changes that are a problem.