149
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
149 points (100.0% liked)
World News
22025 readers
79 users here now
Breaking news from around the world.
News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
For US News, see the US News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
but...after looking up on Wikipedia
I think they’re advertising the depth limit of the recovery vehicle, not claiming that the wreck is actually at 20,000 feet.
They probably need quite a bit of margin too if the craft accidentally got lost in a deeper area
Maybe they're concerned that it no-clipped through the sea bottom and wound up deeper than the Titanic's current location?
It might be best practice to use a vessel rated for considerably deeper than you actually go, in case of some problem in the hull?
And/or it's just a description of a particular vehicle they're bringing that was most convenient to get there quickly.
It's not like they're going to say, "oh, don't bring THAT recovery vehicle, it can go TOO deep."