cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/8181688
undefined
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
259 points (82.8% liked)
Anarchism
1419 readers
80 users here now
Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.
Other anarchist comms
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Man why would I ever ally with a scumbag like you? You turned into a toxic sludge the moment I didn't indulge your sealioning.
The best part about this meme is seeing so many of you go full masks off publicly
"The tankie was rude to me when I accused him of having an ideology of senseless murder, his rudeness proves we shouldn't have a political coalition"
And the murder too
But we can't talk about the "murder" because then that's me being a debate bro, even as you tacitly admit to it being bullshit in the comments (Stalin not sending you enough bullets is not the same as shooting you, sorry!)
Yes, why do you think I owe you a discussion? Y'all are a bunch of entitled motherfuckers. Just calle me a "radlib" in your dunk tank and it's good no?
There's a reason why the term sealion exists.
Owe, owe, owe. You keep using that word, but I don't think I have. My argument is not that you owe anything, it's that if we are to pretend you are acting in good-faith, then there must be a healthy way for disagreement to exist (see you model the opposite in your title, how those dang tankies hate dissent). What I dislike is parading around completely fatuous claims and treating objections as pathological.
I fucking let you mother truckers run amok in my space to disagree like a bunch of toxic monkeys. If that's not leaving space for "healthy disagreement" I don't know what is!
But that's not enough is it? No if you don't debate me specifically it's not enough.
But you point to everything said as pathology and evidence of evil, and it's unclear that any other disagreeing responses would have been met more kindly.
What? I don't point to "everything said". I pointed 2 things. Entitled sealions like you who didn't take no for an answer and just became a toxic af (as sealions are wont to do) and the hexbear mob which came here to support said sealions with harassment.
I don't trust tankies. I believe that they will betray anarchists in every revolution. Y'all attitude here hasn't helped. But I was perfectly capable of talking to you people like awoo who didn't try to sealion me.
But to just go on collective campaign of harassment because I don't trust y'all and dare to express this publicly and then tell me I'm being unreasonable in my reaction . Like what?
"Why are people bothered by being called butchers!?!?!"
If this is the first time you've seen anarchists who don't trust ml tp not to betray them after a revolution, then you haven't seen met enough anarchists. I don't know what to tell you.
But to react to anarchists who express this like a sealion backed by a harassing mob is just an epic self own man.
I've seen this bit before, literally maybe my first comment is how played-out this is.
See, this is what I mean. "Epic self-own, broski" like, how could one disagree without that being your response?
Omg. Mate disagree all you want. Write a whole epic takedown for all I care. I haven't banned you. Just don't expect me to debate you.
My point is that your inability to accept I won't debate you on this and then your immediate turn to insults along with the rest of the hexbears is, let's say, not endearing.
Why do you complain about insults when you say much worse shit than I ever did in the OP?
I don't care about your insults. I've left half of hexbear insult me in this thread.
You clearly care, or you wouldn't still be working to hard to convince everyone that you're actually laughing
I think if db0 actually cared he would've defederated the instance from Hexbear like many others have due to your instance's tendency to post disruptive spam, engage in flame wars, and also allegedly sabotaging other instances.
Every time someone gets mad at us, that telephone-generated list of supposed internet crimes gets longer. Spam and flame wars sure, that's just what you call it when communists are both outspoken and don't genuflect to liberal orthodoxy. But sabotage? That's a new one. Give it a year and I bet you'll start hearing about our WMDs too.