"fantasy wizard holding an AK47". Bing added the shades on its own lol
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
293 points (94.8% liked)
AI Art & Image Generation
2031 readers
1 users here now
A place to share images and art generated by artificial intelligence and similar tools.
Rules:
-
All posts must be relevant to image generation with artificial intelligence.
-
Please include the name of the AI or tool used to generate your image at beginning of your post to promote searchability. Example: "[Midjourney] Picture of a lake."
-
It's not required, but we encourage you to include the prompt used to generate the image in the description of your post.
-
To avoid spam, please try to limit yourself to five posts a day. Feel free to add as many images to your posts as you'd like.
-
Please keep NSFW content to a minimum. Risque content is allowed, but pornographic AI art is not. There are plenty of other places to share that. Posts not flagged as NSFW will result in a temporary ban.
-
Do not self promote your AI tools you created without mod permission. Also any other post about AI tools that seem sketchy will be removed and the user banned at the moderators discretion. Please report a post if you think it should fall in line with breaking this rule.
-
Please be nice to your fellow users and make sure to follow Lemmy World's rules of conduct: https://mastodon.world/about
Recommended Communities:
-
Check out [email protected] for more AI Images.
-
Check out [email protected] for discussion about AI tools you can use in your Dungeons & Dragons games.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A shame that AI apps wipe signatures and watermarks. Would be cool to know who actually created the images used to cobble this together.
Each image in the training set contributes only about a single byte to the AI model. Meaning there are no "source" images in any meaningful way.
Edit: A minute of fiddling with DALLE-3 I got this (and a dozen similar ones). Did I stole from OP? Did we steal from the same source? Or is a prompt like:
"cool sky wizard with a long lush white beard with sunglasses and a Gandalf hat shooting an ak-47 in front of a galaxy cloud scifi backdrop, fog, clouds, magical, stylized digital painting, heroic posing, god rays, forshortening, roto zoom, wind blowing through his hair, brass flying out of the gun"
Simply enough to describe this kind of image reasonably closely?
Sure Jan.
Doesn't change the fact that these apps are trained on stolen data, and soon, when they're sued into oblivion, they'll be forced to credit artists in a meaningful way.
When artists can't even figure out what was stolen they really have no leg to stand on. Complete cluelessness of how any of this works doesn't help either.
And beside these kinds of arguments are just complete hypocrite bullshit to begin with. Human artists use references all the time. If the law decides that that's illegal, they'll be in even deeper trouble than they already are.
Also the only one that would profit from these lawsuits would be Adobe, Shutterstock and all the other mega-corp content hoarders out there. You'll be stuck with AI image generation all the same, but instead of it being free and available to everybody, you'd be paying a hefty subscription fee to them.
Either way, AI image generation is the way forward. The genie is out of the bottle. Get used to it