this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
21 points (61.3% liked)
Fediverse
28351 readers
584 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Isn't this like stealing, guys? No, not from Reddit - from authors. Ask for a consent before mirroring anything, for the love of Fediverse. Cheers!
The better question would be whether this constitutes fair-use. Because it's certainly not stealing.
TINLA: factors for fair use don't seem to align, though.
About that last point: solvable by manually gathering authors' links or making a hyperlink to respective Reddit profiles.
Adding a link to the original profile is quite easy and it would help alleviate the issue.
Also, keeping in mind that one of the goals of such a tool is to get people on reddit to be aware of the alternatives... the easiest way to let people on reddit to file a claim and/or to remove copy they don't want copyrighted would be to let simply let they taking over their mirrored instance by proving they own their reddit account. And if this tools becomes popular enough to the point that redditors start signing up to the fediverse because the copied instance is getting significant viewership, then mission. fucking. accomplished.
It does not merit a verification of the author, when you hold their content encaged somewhere they did not approve yet. You say it's to increase registrations on Fediverse and for the brighter future, but please remember to deal with this ethically. Creator deserves to know first that your mirror (or whatever ends up being) intends to seek engagement with their piece.
Linking to original, as we both proposed, is an aftermath. Top three factors also need to be addressed if you claim fair use.
As an alternative, asking for consent and delaying repost is not a rocket science.
I'm failing to see how their content is "encaged" anywhere, and I'm failing to see how this would be any different from what, e.g, the Internet Archive does.
You only need to recall where it took the Internet Archive, no matter the intent it has. But let's presume for a minute that a lot of it is educational: does unsolicited art reposting constitute an educational purpose, commentary, criticism, news, or a parody? If all that fails to meet, at least work with the portions that you're taking.