this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
161 points (97.6% liked)

UK Politics

3086 readers
31 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Exclusive: Sunak could be presiding over ‘wake’ at conference, warns Prof John Curtice – with voters furious over NHS failures, cost of living, migrants and Liz Truss

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People often make this argument, that PR would somehow lock in left wing governance, but that simply hasn't been the experience in other countries that have adopted it. We'd get just as many Tory minorities, propped up by Lib Dem or whatever Ukip's called these days, as the other way around.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What we wouldn't get, though, are 80+ seat Tory majorities on 35% of the vote. There's also the fact that in countries with PR, right-wing governments are closer to the centre than they are in countries without it. Minority governments and coalitions have to compromise to get anything done, which leads to better, more balanced legislation more often, while taking into account a broader range of viewpoints which, crucially, represent the whole country and not just a segment of it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, and I agree that's broadly a good thing. But it also means the likes of Ukip end up in government.

We already have the valorisation of compromise under FPTP in the form of battling for the 'centre ground': parties compromise with the electorate in order to win. Under PR, parties compromise with each other in order to govern.

Is one better than the other? I think PR is better, because the compromise is continuous. But there's not a lot in it.

This is why although I basically agree PR is a good thing, I don't prioritise it.