this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
161 points (97.6% liked)

UK Politics

3086 readers
33 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Exclusive: Sunak could be presiding over ‘wake’ at conference, warns Prof John Curtice – with voters furious over NHS failures, cost of living, migrants and Liz Truss

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, and I agree that's broadly a good thing. But it also means the likes of Ukip end up in government.

We already have the valorisation of compromise under FPTP in the form of battling for the 'centre ground': parties compromise with the electorate in order to win. Under PR, parties compromise with each other in order to govern.

Is one better than the other? I think PR is better, because the compromise is continuous. But there's not a lot in it.

This is why although I basically agree PR is a good thing, I don't prioritise it.