this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
1134 points (92.3% liked)

linuxmemes

21304 readers
1421 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    Re-creation of someone else's post because the original was removed and I found it funny when I first saw it

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Linux: "my users spend half their time troubleshooting"

    [–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I am a Windows guy, but I occasionally have to work with Linux. I spend a lot of time googling weird problems with cryptic solutions. That’s my experience trying to do anything technical with Linux. I can’t really remember the last time I had a problem in windows, but that’s not to say windows is perfect. It’s taken a hit in usability recently, which is weird since they’ve had decades to refine things. I recently installed pop os as a dual boot and it’s been pretty great with the ability to play games. I haven’t really had to do anything technical and I find myself using it more than I thought.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    At least most problems under Linux have solutions and if you are really desperate you have the option to fix it yourself in the source or pay someone to do it. Under windows, if microsoft doesn't care about your problem, you either find a workaround or live with it.

    [–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    Because of the ginormous community, every problem has a solution in Windows.

    If it isn't a Microsoft sanctioned solution, then multiple third party solutions exists that fix it.

    Windows has a hell of a lot more support than any Linux distribution does.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    If it isn’t a Microsoft sanctioned solution, then multiple third party solutions exists that fix it.

    That's not how this works. If it's not a Microsoft-sancioned solution, it literally cannot be fixed no matter how much effort you put in. You need an API to work with Windows. If Microsoft does not provide you with an API, you can't do it. And even if you find a way to hack together something, you have zero guarantee an update won't just come along and fuck it. Linux distros are open source, you can change quite literally any thing about them. That is what that person was talking about.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

    the thing is, microsoft does provide stable, well-documented and backwards-compatible apis for just about anything imaginable, and even if that's not enough, you can try interacting with the kernel directly

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I can't say I share this experience as I spend a lot more than half my time using Linux watching documentaries on youtube in a web browser. If you are obsessed with personalization I could see this happening, but I happen to prefer using default (as in "possible to consistently re-apply") settings on most things.

    Regardless, troubleshooting makes you better at resolving trouble that you didn't bring about on your own, and life is defined by unexpected troubles. It is better to be antifragile than happy!

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I guess you're lucky (or much more tech-savvy than me). I tried to switch to linux once many years ago (pre-COVID, which is like ancient times now). It was horrible. Oh, I now need to learn about file systems and NTFS and ext3/4(?) - i guess i’ll try Linux on a separate, old hard drive. Ok, something didn’t work, I now have to figure out what driver wasn’t supported and what I need to download. Great, people on forums are helpful but they’re asking me a bunch of gibberish. Now I gotta figure out this command line thing. Oh cool some people built GUIs for certain stuff so i don’t need to play with the command line, but then the GUI doesn’t work occasionally and now I have to figure out if it’s the GUI that broke or something else. And then at some point I got stuck because of file permissions.

    [–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    Ok, something didn’t work, I now have to figure out what driver wasn’t supported and what I need to download.

    Unlike in Windows where you never need to download drivers. As executable binaries you have no chance of checking. Sometimes from very questionable sources. And actually you can be happy if it's only a driver. Installing random 3rd party tools just to get basic functionality is a thing.

    people on forums are helpful

    Which also happens for Windows. But rarely. And if they really try... then there are still 10 different answers to a single problem and you have to test which one works for your specific version (no, chosing the most recent one sounds logical but is rarely the answer).

    Now I gotta figure out this command line thing. Oh cool some people built GUIs for certain stuff so i don’t need to play with the command line

    Which in what way is worse then editing random obscure values in the registry? Because it's a window you type in. And in the worst case even the Windows help starts with poweshell nowadays, which is exactly the same.

    And then at some point I got stuck because of file permissions.

    That's a solveable problem. Unlike in Windows where they put file permissions on top a file system not having them in a weird unintutive way. And don't ever try to change the wrong permission as an administrator as that's simply not allowed. After all you don't own your Windows PC, MS just gratiously allows you to use it.

    So, you see... it's all a matter of perspective.

    [–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

    10 different answers

    No there’s only ever one answer and it’s “have you tried ‘sfc /scannow’?” But it never works, even if it finds an alleged problem.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    Trying to use proprietary drivers and NTFS on Linux is trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. People work hard to make it work and maybe it does with a little effort but the proprietary model and Linux distros just don't mesh well together. If you make it a point to purchase hardware that has open source drivers and use open source software (and as a consumer, you probably should anyway), everything does just work. Obviously this may not suit your use case and Linux may just not be for you.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    NTFS is okay if you're mounting a drive that you share with a Windows machine but don't actually install Linux to an NTFS partition please. Most of the "beginner friendly" distros I don't think even let you.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

    There's no way that would work, would it? I can't imagine installing linux to an NTFS volume and it actually functioning.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

    If I was in your situation, I would try installing openSUSE or Fedora Linux on a computer where you don't care if the entire disk gets wiped occasionally, using a flash drive you also don't care about getting wiped occasionally. They probably have sufficiently comprehensive installers and installation instructions for you to succeed in using one of them, and if you don't care about the content of the disks you use you'll be more willing to experiment with the installation process (even though it's unlikely your computer will work worse due to trying to install a Linux distribution). If you use a computer that has become slower and less usable than you'd like you will probably be pleasantly surprised by the results!

    Also, you can back up your product keys and prepare a Microsoft Windows installation disk if being able to go back to Windows 10 makes you more comfortable with experimenting.

    Overall, Linux enhanced my ability to to get productive work done, and also the opportunity to experiment and learn more about how to use computers to solve problems. I think learning how to use a GNU operating system is a good long term investment, though if you still need to keep around at least one computer that runs Microsoft Windows to protect your income I won't disparage you.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The key to customization is not going out of bounds. If you customize, do it the way it was intended to be customized, not by finding weird, hacky shit that works like some kind of digital Rube Goldberg machine. If you find yourself writing convoluted bash scripts, and dredging up plugins on GitHub with the last commit from 2012, you're on a crash course with destiny.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

    Hey, how'd you see what I've done to my Android phone?

    Cause this exactly describes what I do to it. Then I get weird conflicts. Lol. I do it to myself.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

    I was primarily noting that I usually don't engage in unnecessary and unproductive customization, as there will always be some way you could meet your desires a little better, but unless you're creating and documenting an automated system like https://larbs.xyz/ or even just "copy this file to ~/.profile" your customizations will eventually be lost when your system fails, leaving you with new reason to spend more time customizing.

    As the video I linked said: if computers are as powerful as the universe and the universe was created in billions of years, you may only be done customizing billions of years from now (and at that point you will have had even more billions of years to come up with new ways you want to improve your customization).

    If I'm spending time on something that won't result in an update to a git repository, or a Lemmy comment, or even speaking to someone in person or me acquiring more property, I consider it more frivolous than not.

    [–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

    Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

    obsessed with personalization

    Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

    I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I have to use windows at work. I have to spend a lot more time trouble shooting there than on my bleeding edge rolling release linux at home.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

    That is because you perform more work on your work computer instead of browsing lemmy all day.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

    I've had hard time troubleshooting on Windows because everything is obfuscated behind so many layers. And there's just things you can't feasibly do. But it does seem to work well most of the time.