52
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I mean compared to all the horrible shit the US has done to other countries 9/11 was like petty thievery

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

And in response the US killed over a million.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Not to mention the attacks were a result of the US meddling in foreign affairs.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

that's primarily why i don't joke about it. imagine the world if 9/11 never happened.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Flying would be a lot more relaxed.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The US dropped two nukes on Japan, invaded Vietnam for no reason, instigated coups in a variety of sovereign countries and committed countless other atrocities to sustain the military industrial complex. That’s a lot more than some 3000 deaths

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

The same thing can be said about Japan. A lot more people died by the hands of the Japanese Empire during WW2 than those two nukes did.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Still, dropped it on two civilian targets.

Imagine Russia taking out LA and NYC; you guys would never let anyone forget that no matter what

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Rape of Nanjing, bro. Rape of Nanjing.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Agreed, not a good thing. Abu Ghraib ring any bells?

See? We can do this all day long but in the end the fact is that these "tactical nukes" weren't used to take out parts of the command structure, but to vaporise not one but two major civilian population centres.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Agreed, not a good thing. Abu Ghraib ring any bells?

That's not even fucking close.

but in the end the fact is that these “tactical nukes” weren’t used to take out parts of the command structure,

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were both chosen for their military and industrial importance.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were both chosen for their military and industrial importance.

I could probably say the same for San Fransisco if it was chosen.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

You absolutely could. San Fran was a major logistics hub during the Second World War.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And we'd never hear the end of it, yet it's no big deal when done abroad.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Are you saying that the West thinks Hiroshima and Nagasaki are no big deal?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

yet it’s no big deal when done abroad.

I see you aren't interested in any serious discussion considering that the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are a major event in the American cultural consciousness and still evoke strong reactions even today.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Tankie brain doesn't comprehend such stuff

[-] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

So you think 3,000 innocent lives deserved it?

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Who the actual fuck was saying that?

They were saying that compared to the damage the US has inflicted on other countries, including innocent civilian populations, the damage done by the 9/11 attacks is much smaller

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Do you commemorate all the other atrocities?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I don't think you can really compare terrorist acts on a tit for tat basis. Two wrongs don't make a right. The last 20 years has proved it didn't really achieve much good for anyone ever, just a lot of bullshit.

Like were the people who died in 9/11 directly responsible for the horrible shit their government did? No.

Why was the attack not on a political building anyway?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

The Pentagon is a government building. Everyone seems to focus on the towers and forgets American Airlines Flight 77.

Regardless, the point of terrorism is to cause terror, not necessarily to kill people who “deserve” it.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That's true I did forget the Pentagon building because I'm an idiot

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Oh, good, whataboutism for terrorist attacks by Saudi extremists on unambiguous civilian targets. Guess this is left praxis now.

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
52 points (80.2% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1268 readers
306 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate-speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of bias)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism or any variation of Tankie Ideology. There is no justifying Genocide.

Revisionism — Downplaying or denying atrocities past and present will result in an immediate ban.

If you're violating instance rules, you'll typically be warned. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last seven days, but repeat infractions will have longer sentences. You may ask to be unbanned.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS