goat

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

They truly are redditors

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

They already do that. They do it a lot on Reddit.

I know some of them who have like five reddit alts they cycle through in a single week. Truly bizarre

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

They've said much worse this past year

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (8 children)

It's open source, yeah, but is there much of a future in it? Lemmy as a whole doesn't make a whole lot of original content.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (13 children)

Fantastic post! thank you!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I love it when they say reactionary. It's the ultimate projection. Like reactionaries are exactly what they are, urging to return to Soviet-era communism.

their only idols are long-dead dictators or people who want to return to how things previously were. Like Winnie the Pooh wanting Taiwan to return to China

Reactionaries full and through

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I wouldn't care much if downvotes are removed.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

but it's infinity.

you can't just remove half of the thought experiment and say that we have an answer. thought the guardian was better than that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because Lemmy is filled with bugs and the devs would rather spend time being tankies as opposed to developing a website they hate

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

That's normally how it goes. Turns out their views don't actually hold up to scrutiny.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They removed the downvotes because they were getting too many of them. cute

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
23
Tankies celebrate rape (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 

OMG CHINA BASED?!

 
114
mortla comat (sh.itjust.works)
 
view more: next ›