this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
22 points (100.0% liked)

College Football

837 readers
14 users here now

A community to discuss college football.

Find your team's community

Join the Fanaticus Discord

Vote in the community poll

/c/CFB Poll Top 25 Fanaticus
1. Oregon Oregon
2. Indiana Indiana
3. Ohio State Ohio State
4. Miami Miami
5. Georgia Georgia
6. Texas Texas
7. Notre Dame Notre Dame
8. BYU BYU
9. Tennessee Tennessee
10. Penn State Penn State
11. Alabama Alabama
12. SMU SMU
13. Boise State Boise State
14. Ole Miss Mississippi
15. Army Army
16. LSU Louisiana State
17. Texas A&M Texas A&M
18. Iowa State Iowa State
19. Pitt Pitt
20. Washington State Washington State
21. Clemson Clemson
T-22. Louisville Louisville
T-22. South Carolina South Carolina
24. Kansas State Kansas State
25. Colorado Colorado

Check out our other sports communities!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Stanford and Cal are expected to take reduced television revenue shares, while SMU will earn no television revenue from the league for approximately nine years.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are a few EXTREMELY rich families of donors, including the Hunt family that owns the Chiefs and FC Dallas, who have just promised to float the program and fund NIL at competitive levels, but I do not envy their athletic department staff. They're going to be begging, borrowing, and stealing for the better part of a decade to keep up appearances, and if the football team doesn't make some noise, the culture could get pretty toxic in University Park. They also have 30+ years of alumni who picked SMU despite sports not mattering and 30+ years of locals who found something else to care about.

TCU is constantly on a razor's edge for general interest, even with 20 years of being an excellent G5 and respectable P5 program. It's just such a crowded market. Winning will fix a lot of things, but winning at any sustained or impressive level been the missing part of the SMU equation so far.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

impressive level

They have recently done this. They were ranked as high as 15 in November a few years ago. They clearly showed potential (albeit for one year). Did it come crashing down? Yes, of course. But hey, they had those clean Dallas tribute unis and that makes up for it, right?

That was just before NIL. Now that programs can openly flaunt cash, who's going to stop them from returning to their Pony Excess ways?