this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
331 points (98.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5245 readers
280 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
331
Climate extremists (davewalker.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
46 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Black and white cartoon. Left panel: a group blocks a road with a banner reading "No new oil | so there's a liveable planet for our children." Right panel: A boardroom, with members of the board raising their hands. In front of them is a chart showing planned oil extraction going well above a dashed line marked "Level beyond which there will be no livable plant for our children.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we really want to split hairs over money, how much would it cost to replace Earth?

Like c'mon, we're really gonna incinerate our own biosphere over some money? Shouldn't this be a problem to tackle, spare no expense?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They're also acting as it there is a lack of money in the first place, because they don't see those who are profiting off of the destruction of earth as also responsible.
Honestly, I'd love a diagram of the mental gymnastics you need to be able to so wholeheartedly yourself of that...