this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
24 points (87.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26831 readers
1343 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Can someone provide clarity on data ownership ? Can we make it so the data can't be sold, monetized or used in any detrimental way towards society via an ELA?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Your example works because Getty as the copyright holder will actively pursue violations.

The instance admin has no intrinsic motivation of doing so, and certainly won't go to court on behalf of a user.

You'd be better off to finish every one of your comments with "licensed under MIT v3.0" or something.

And forcing admins to agree to terms with others before federating will lead to no federation. If I'm running an instance with no financial incentive whatsoever for the benefit of the public, the last thing I want is to get wrapped up in legal red tape. And as a layman, I couldn't possibly understood all terms with their implications and ramifications, and would require legal council to proceed. That ain't free either.