this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
13 points (88.2% liked)
AskUSA
267 readers
67 users here now
About
Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Non-US people are welcome to provide their perspective! Please keep in mind:
- [email protected] - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
- [email protected] - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here
Rules
- Be nice or gtfo
- Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
- Follow the rules of discuss.online
Sister communities
Related communities
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is what people don't like to understand: you can make your own stuff at home, and bring something (water? coffee in a thermos?) with you where you need to go. You choose what you do, not what others do. But enragement tactics gotta spread their messages farther (on platforms like Reddit, and X, and Facebook) for the sake of profits I guess... Except: do they? Especially here on the Fediverse? Here we can choose to let all of that go, if we want. 🆓
That said, if I understood OOP correctly they are saying that they receive less value for the money from iced coffee than for a regular coffee - leaving out the crucial details that we here would have needed to know, like whether the iced vs. regular were the same price, though making sure to retain all of the emotional judgey overtones ofc, taking care of the important stuff and the rest is just details! 😛
OP complained that when they order what's usually half a cup of coffee with half a cup of ice, but without the ice, they only get half a cup of coffee for the same price, instead of a full cup of coffee.
Right. Which is identically the same amount of coffee as it always was, simply less ice... as they asked for, and were given.
If they expected to be given more coffee in return for less money, then they should rethink their expectations, bc that would be entitlement thinking.
More likely, I thought they might have finally started to think more deeply about how much iced coffee costs compared to hot coffee, and only just then started to realize that it has never been something worth the price. They could have done that type of thinking at any time. Although in this case, they did not give us as the audience sufficient information, specifically the relationship between the costs of those two drinks.
Edit: sorry and now I may be doing the same. A "latte" is not the same as a "coffee" in the USA. The former is a mixture of espresso and steamed milk, while the latter is a "drip coffee", so an entirely different preparation method of the beans, the liquid itself, its storage duration, and too the milk, plus possibly effort from the server although in this case it sounds like a machine for everything. But still the ingredients lsit differs between "latte" and "coffee". And then from there I get lost bc ordering a latte but being given a coffee would be sufficient grounds to return it for either a full refund or else exchange for what was ordered? Thus I presumed that thenceforth, "coffee" actually meant "latte", which included the milk portion as well. But that's an assumption. And then another assumption is that the coffee portions are also identical between the iced vs. non. They legitimately might be - I dunno? - but I also don't know for sure.