Self Hosted - Self-hosting your services.

11451 readers

2 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules

No harassment
crossposts from c/Open Source & c/docker & related may be allowed, depending on context
Video Promoting is allowed if is within the topic.
No spamming.
Stay friendly.
Follow the lemmy.ml instance rules.
Tag your post. (Read under)

Important

Beginning of January 1st 2024 this rule WILL be enforced. Posts that are not tagged will be warned and if not fixed within 24h then removed!

Lemmy doesn't have tags yet, so mark it with [Question], [Help], [Project], [Other], [Promoting] or other you may think is appropriate.

Cross-posting

[email protected] is allowed!
[email protected] is allowed!
[email protected] is allowed!
[email protected] is allowed if topic has to do with selfhosting.
[email protected] is allowed!

If you see a rule-breaker please DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Why are top level domains so restricted? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I thought it would be cool to have my own TLD, but apparently it's all managed by the ICANN, so you can't just name your website with any TLD you want. There are different prices. But at least you can customize your second level domain. Why aren't TLDs like this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But why did everyone agree to that? Couldn't domains be determined by user, or at least a bit more decentralized? (ex: google.com leads to IP address 1.1.1.1)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

How is the internet supposed to work if we don't agree on where every site goes? How are you supposed to decentralize a central agreement?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I meant more like did it have to be a central agreement for it to scale up to what it is now?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There's nothing to scale. DNS servers are just an address book. There's only 200 million entries active and visited. 1.1b entries otherwise, which; for a computer isn't a lot.

DNS servers replicate down-stream, and the root servers maintain authority. A local SQLite file could handle this easily, and you could always run your own DNS server locally if you wanted to. But there has to be a central authority. That's why you can have any TLD you want -- you run your own DNS. But since nobody sees you as an authority, they won't be using your DNS.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

DNS isn't just an address book, it determines ownership. So in a decentralized system I could just spin up some servers that direct anyone in my area trying to reach PayPal to my IP instead.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Insanely, this is kind of how IP addresses are assigned using bgp.