this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
688 points (97.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

5793 readers
3134 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

So, I'm going to suggest India was actually more complicated.

It was non-violent, but with a strong threat that 'you can't keep us, China went red, Russia will help us too'.

Gandhi's pacifism was the face the British put on it to make it look less like they'd been beaten by communism (the congress party was vaguely socialist , but mostly in name only, far less so than other, more hindu parties, it stood for corruption more than anything really).

Also the partition guaranteed neither country would be a major international concern for decades, as they'd be too busy dealing with each other.

You can say a lot about the British, but they were great at IR.