this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
739 points (94.0% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

814 readers
543 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 102 points 2 months ago (4 children)

A liberal would feed 100 people on the off chance one needed food. A conservative would deny 100 people food on the off chance one didn’t deserve it.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Liberals are clearly the lesser evil, but sadly both get into bed with lobbyists and capitalists that created the housing and food shortage in the first place. Liberals just want slightly less evil capitalism while conservatives want aggressively more evil capitalism.

[–] duckduckohno@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

But by wanting a less evil capitalism they get accused of being communists etc...

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

A liberal would feed 100 people on the off chance one needed food.

That's not how means testing works, unfortunately.